The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?
Abstract
Ratings of corporations' environmental activities and capabilities influence billions of dollars of “socially responsible” investments as well as some consumers, activists, and potential employees. In one of the first studies to assess these ratings, we examine how well the most widely used ratings—those of Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Research & Analytics (KLD)—provide transparency about past and likely future environmental performance. We find KLD “concern” ratings to be fairly good summaries of past environmental performance. In addition, firms with more KLD concerns have slightly, but statistically significantly, more pollution and regulatory compliance violations in later years. KLD environmental strengths, in contrast, do not accurately predict pollution levels or compliance violations. Moreover, we find evidence that KLD's ratings are not optimally using publicly available data. We discuss the implications of our findings for advocates and skeptics of corporate social responsibility as well as for studies that relate social responsibility ratings to financial performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x · Cited by 1,569
Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?
Green, F. (2004) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00359.x · Cited by 408
Cited by
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.00000005 · Cited by 4,337
Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings
Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfac033 · Cited by 3,444
Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth
Krüger, P. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · Cited by 1,901
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030 · Cited by 1,134
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2268 · Cited by 1,124
Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.51 · Cited by 1,116
How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk
Kölbel, J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2647 · Cited by 682
Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic
Bae, K.-H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z. (., & Guedhami, O. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876 · Cited by 581
Peer Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility
Cao, J., Liang, H., & Zhan, X. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3100 · Cited by 573
Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-3005-6 · Cited by 544
How firms respond to being rated
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.840 · Cited by 547
Self-citationCSR disclosure: the more things change…?
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1549 · Cited by 413
Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003 · Cited by 385
Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact
Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319900539 · Cited by 358
Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and cost of equity: A cross-country comparison
Breuer, W., Müller, T., Rosenbach, D., & Salzmann, A. (2018) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.018 · Cited by 350
Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022 · Cited by 245
Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity
Gubler, T., Larkin, I., & Pierce, L. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2883 · Cited by 222
Movements, Markets and Fields: The Effects of Anti-Sweatshop Campaigns on U.S. Firms, 1993-2000
Bartley, T., & Child, C. (2011) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sor010 · Cited by 185
Deconstructing corporate sustainability: A comparison of different stakeholder metrics
Antolín-López, R., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Montiel, I. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.111 · Cited by 184
Socially Responsible Investing in Good and Bad Times
Bansal, R., Wu, D. (., & Yaron, A. (2022) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhab072 · Cited by 165
(2012) · Cited by 39
External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals
Hong, K., Kim, J., & Kwack, S. Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137599 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-169
- ISSN
- 1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9134
- OpenAlex
- W3121227745
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 141.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
