Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Thin‐film Photovoltaic Electricity Generation: Systematic Review and Harmonization

Kim, Hyung Chul, Fthenakis, Vasilis, Choi, Jun‐Ki, Turney, Damon E.·2012·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: We present the process and the results of harmonization of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the life cycle of commercial thin‐film photovoltaics (PVs), that is, amorphous silicon (a‐Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS). We reviewed 109 studies and harmonized the estimates of GHG emissions by aligning the assumptions, parameters, and system boundaries. During the initial screening we eliminated abstracts, short conference papers, presentations without supporting documentation, and unrelated analyses; 91 studies passed this initial screening. In the primary screening we applied rigorous criteria for completeness of reporting, validity of analysis methods, and modern relevance of the PV system studied. Additionally, we examined whether the product is a commercial one, whether the production line still exists, and whether the study's core data are original or secondary. These screenings produced five studies as the best representations of the carbon footprint of modern thin‐film PV technologies. These were harmonized through alignment of efficiency, irradiation, performance ratio, balance of system, and lifetime. The resulting estimates for carbon footprints are 20, 14, and 26 grams carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt‐hour (g CO 2 ‐eq/kWh), respectively, for a‐Si, CdTe, and CIGS, for ground‐mount application under southwestern United States (US‐SW) irradiation of 2,400 kilowatt‐hours per square meter per year (kWh/m 2 /yr), a performance ratio of 0.8, and a lifetime of 30 years. Harmonization for the rooftop PV systems with a performance ratio of 0.75 and the same irradiation resulted in carbon footprint estimates of 21, 14, and 27 g CO 2 ‐eq/kWh, respectively, for the three technologies. This screening and harmonization rectifies previous incomplete or outdated assessments and clarifies variations in carbon footprints across studies and amongst thin‐film technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00423.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H. C., Fthenakis, V., Choi, J., & Turney, D. E.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2012-03-06
Volume
16
Issue
s1
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W1571574068
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Thin‐film Photovoltaic Electricity Generation: Systematic Review and Harmonization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00423.x
The paper
Kim, H. C., Fthenakis, V., Choi, J., & Turney, D. E. (2012). Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Thin‐film Photovoltaic Electricity Generation: Systematic Review and Harmonization. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00423.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.