Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clock Completion: An Objective Screening Test for Dementia

Watson, Yasmira I., Arfken, Cynthia L., Birge, Stanley J.·1993·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective To develop a simple, readily administered and scored screening test for dementia utilizing the clock‐drawing task. Design Retrospective analysis of clock‐drawing errors and prospective validations. Setting Hospital‐based outpatient geriatric assessment clinic, rehabilitation service, apartment building for older adults, and long‐term care facility. Participants Convenience sample of patients attending the geriatric assessment clinic, patients on the rehabilitation service, or residents of the above sites. Measurements Sensitivity and specificity of a clock‐scoring system in identifying patients with dementia and the comparison of this system with the Short Blessed Test (SBT) in the diagnosis of dementia and in the prospective validation of the test. Results Of the 10 clock‐drawing errors evaluated, placement of digits in a pre‐drawn circle had the greatest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing patients with irreversible dementia from patients with other disorders who did not meet NINCDS‐ADRDA criteria for probable dementia. The derived scoring system had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 82%, compared with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88% for the SBT in identifying dementia. Test‐retest reliability for the distinction between demented and non‐demented was 82%, with a Kappa of 0.63 for the clock completion, and 82%, with a Kappa of 0.62 for the SBT. Inter‐rater reliability for clock completion was 0.90 to 0.93. Conclusion A simple, completely objective scoring system for a clock completion test has been developed which involves only the number of digits placed in the fourth quadrant of a pre‐drawn circle. This readily administered test is as effective in screening for dementia as the longer six‐item SBT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07308.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Watson, Y. I., Arfken, C. L., & Birge, S. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1235-1240
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1992830537
Cited by
339
References
4
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clock Completion: An Objective Screening Test for Dementia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07308.x
The paper
Watson, Y. I., Arfken, C. L., & Birge, S. J. (1993). Clock Completion: An Objective Screening Test for Dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07308.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.