Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlates and Management of Nonmalignant Pain in the Nursing Home

Won, Aida, Lapane, Kate, Gambassi, Giovanni, Bernabei, Roberto, Mor, Vince, Lipsitz, Lewis A., on behalf of the SAGE Study Group·1999·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nonmalignant pain is a common problem among older people. The prevalence of pain in the nursing home is not well studied. We looked at the association between nonmalignant pain, psychological and functional health, and the practice patterns for pain management in the nursing home. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study. SETTING: Nursing Home in four US states. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 49,971 nursing home residents from 1992 to 1995. MEASUREMENTS: We used the SAGE database (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric drug use via Epidemiology), which linked information from the Minimum Data Set and nursing home drug utilization data. The MDS items measured included pain, activities of daily living (ADL) function, mood, and time involved in activities. The use of analgesics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants was also documented. RESULTS: Daily pain was reported in 26% of nursing home residents. The prevalence was lower among men, persons more than age 85, and racial minorities. Persons suffering pain daily were more likely to have severe ADL impairment, odds ratio (OR) (2.47 (95% CI, 2.34–2.60)), more depressive signs and symptoms (OR 1.66 (95% CI, 1.57–1.75)), and less frequent involvement in activities (OR 1.35 (95% CI, 1.29–1.40)). Approximately 25% of persons with daily pain received no analgesics. Residents who were more than 85 years old (OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.28)), cognitively impaired, (OR 1.44 (95% CI, 1.29–1.61)), of male gender (OR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06–1.29)), or a racial minority (OR 1.69 (95% CI, 1.40–2.05) and OR 1.56 (95% CI, 0.70–1.04) for blacks and Hispanics, respectively) were at greater risk of not receiving analgesics. Approximately 50% of those in pain used physical and occupational therapies, which was more than two times higher (OR 2.44 (95% CI, 2.34–2.54)), than use for those not in pain. CONCLUSIONS: Daily nonmalignant pain is prevalent among nursing home residents and is often associated with impairments in ADL, mood, and decreased activity involvement. Even when pain was recognized, men, racial minorities, and cognitively impaired residents were at increased risk for undertreatment. More education and research is necessary to improve the recognition and management of pain in the nursing home, remembering that attention should be paid to populations at increased risk for underrecognition and undertreatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01287.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Won, A., Lapane, K., Gambassi, G., Bernabei, R., Mor, V., Lipsitz, L. A., & on behalf of the SAGE Study Group
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-08
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
936-942
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2065167866
Cited by
315
References
2
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlates and Management of Nonmalignant Pain in the Nursing Home. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01287.x
The paper
Won, A., Lapane, K., Gambassi, G., Bernabei, R., Mor, V., Lipsitz, L. A., & on behalf of the SAGE Study Group. (1999). Correlates and Management of Nonmalignant Pain in the Nursing Home. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01287.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.