Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Protective Effect of Emotional Vitality on Adverse Health Outcomes in Disabled Older Women

Penninx, Brenda W.J.H., Guralnik, Jack M., Bandeen‐Roche, Karen, Kasper, Judith D., Simonsick, Eleanor M., Ferrucci, Luigi, Fried, Linda P.·2000·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE : Although the adverse physical health consequences of negative emotions have been studied extensively, much less is known about the potential impact of positive emotions. This study examines whether emotional vitality protects against progression of disability and mortality in disabled older women. DESIGN : A community‐based study, The Women's Health and Aging Study. PARTICIPANTS : A total of 1002 moderately to severely disabled women aged 65 years and older living in the community. MEASUREMENTS : Emotional vitality was defined as having a high sense of personal mastery, being happy, and having low depressive symptomatology and anxiety. The onset of new disability was determined by semiannual assessments of disability in performing activities of daily living (ADLs), walking across a room, walking ¼ mile, and lifting/carrying 10 pounds. Mortality status was determined by proxy interviews and linkage with death certificates. Survival analyses with time to onset of specific disabilities (among those not disabled at baseline) and time to mortality were performed and adjusted for age, baseline level of difficulty, physical performance, and chronic conditions. RESULTS : Three hundred fifty‐one of the 1002 older disabled women studied were emotionally vital. Among women without the specific disability at baseline, emotional vitality was associated with a significantly decreased risk for incident disability performing ADLs (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66–0.99), for incident disability walking one‐quarter mile (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59–0.92), and for incident disability lifting/carrying 10 pounds (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63–0.95). Emotional vitality was also associated with a lower risk of dying (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39–0.80). These results were not simply caused by the absence of depression since protective health effects remained when emotionally vital women were compared with 334 women who were not emotionally vital and not depressed. CONCLUSIONS : Emotional vitality in older disabled women reduces the risk for subsequent new disability and mortality. Our findings suggest that positive emotions can protect older persons against adverse health outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02622.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Penninx, B. W. J. H., Guralnik, J. M., Bandeen‐Roche, K., Kasper, J. D., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., & Fried, L. P.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1359-1366
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2072724745
Cited by
176
References
6
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Protective Effect of Emotional Vitality on Adverse Health Outcomes in Disabled Older Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02622.x
The paper
Penninx, B. W. J. H., Guralnik, J. M., Bandeen‐Roche, K., Kasper, J. D., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., & Fried, L. P. (2000). The Protective Effect of Emotional Vitality on Adverse Health Outcomes in Disabled Older Women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02622.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.