Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 664

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobility Difficulties and Physical Activity as Predictors of Mortality and Loss of Independence in the Community‐Living Older Population

Hirvensalo, Mirja, Rantanen, Taina, Heikkinen, Eino·2000·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In older people, mobility impairments and physical inactivity are risk factors for further disability and death. We studied the interaction of physical activity and mobility impairment as a predictor of dependence and mortality. DESIGN: A population‐based, prospective study. The data were collected in structured interviews in the year 1988 and 8 years later in the year 1996 as part of the Evergreen Project. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were 1109 independently living, at baseline 65‐ to 84‐year‐old people in the city of Jyväskylä, in central Finland. METHODS: Participants were ranked into four groups: (1) Intact mobility and physically active (Mobile‐Active), (2) Intact mobility and sedentary (Mobile‐Sedentary), (3) Impaired mobility and physically active (Impaired‐Active), and (4) Impaired mobility and sedentary (Impaired‐Sedentary). The confounders adjusted for in the models included age, marital status, education, chronic conditions, smoking, and physical exercise earlier in life. RESULTS: In men and women, the relative risk of death was two times greater in Impaired‐Active and three times greater in Impaired‐Sedentary groups than the risk of death in Mobile‐Active groups. However, the risk of death did not differ between Mobile‐Active and Mobile‐Sedentary groups. The odds ratio for dependency (95% confidence interval) in Impaired‐Sedentary men was 5.21 (1.44–18.70) and in Impaired‐Sedentary women was 2.92 (1.52–5.60) compared to Mobile‐Active groups. The risk of dependence did not differ significantly between Mobile‐Active, Mobile‐Sedentary, and Impaired‐Active groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mobility impairments predicted mortality and dependence. However, among people with impaired mobility, physical activity was associated with lower risks, whereas the risk did not differ according to activity level among those with intact mobility. Despite of their overall greater risk, mobility‐impaired people may be able to prevent further disability and mortality by physical exercise. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 493–498, 2000 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04994.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 664

Metadata

Authors
Hirvensalo, M., Rantanen, T., & Heikkinen, E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
493-498
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1995083258
Cited by
664
References
1
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.