Cited by 836Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Domains of physical activity and all-cause mortality: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies

Open access
Samitz, Guenther, Egger, Matthias, Zwahlen, Marcel·2011·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dose-response relation between physical activity and all-cause mortality is not well defined at present. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association with all-cause mortality of different domains of physical activity and of defined increases in physical activity and energy expenditure. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2010 for cohort studies examining all-cause mortality across different domains and levels of physical activity in adult general populations. We estimated combined risk ratios (RRs) associated with defined increments and recommended levels, using random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression models. RESULTS: Data from 80 studies with 1 338 143 participants (118 121 deaths) were included. Combined RRs comparing highest with lowest activity levels were 0.65 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.60-0.71] for total activity, 0.74 (95% CI 0.70-0.77) for leisure activity, 0.64 (95% CI 0.55-0.75) for activities of daily living and 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.97) for occupational activity. RRs per 1-h increment per week were 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) for vigorous exercise and 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98) for moderate-intensity activities of daily living. RRs corresponding to 150 and 300 min/week of moderate to vigorous activity were 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.85), respectively. Mortality reductions were more pronounced in women. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of total and domain-specific physical activity were associated with reduced all-cause mortality. Risk reduction per unit of time increase was largest for vigorous exercise. Moderate-intensity activities of daily living were to a lesser extent beneficial in reducing mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyr112

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samitz, G., Egger, M., & Zwahlen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Zwahlen, Marcel
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2011-09-05
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1382-1400
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2124173430
Cited by
836
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 22
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
Universität Wien
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity, all-cause mortality, dose-response relationship, leisure-time physical activity, activities of daily living, occupational physical activity, high-intensity exercise, moderate physical activity, energy expenditure, sex differences, recommended physical activity levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Motor Activity, Sports, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review