The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physician Recognition of Cognitive Impairment: Evaluating the Need for Improvement
Abstract
Objectives: To assess physician recognition of dementia and cognitive impairment, compare recognition with documentation, and identify physician and patient factors associated with recognition. Design: Survey of physicians and review of medical records. Setting: Health maintenance organization in southern California. Participants: Seven hundred twenty‐nine physicians who provided care for women participating in a cohort study of memory (Women's Memory Study). Measurements: Percentage of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment (using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status supplemented by the Telephone Dementia Questionnaire) recognized by physicians. Relationship between physician recognition and patient characteristics and physician demographics, practice characteristics, training, knowledge, and attitudes about dementia. Results: Physicians (n=365) correctly identified 81% of patients with dementia and 44% of patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia. Medical records documented cognitive impairment in 83% of patients with dementia and 26% of patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia. In a multivariable model, physicians with geriatric credentials (defined as geriatric fellowship experience and/or the certificate of added qualifications) recognized cognitive impairment more often than did those without (risk ratio (RR)=1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04–1.66). Physicians were more likely to recognize cognitive impairment in patients with a history of depression treatment (RR=1.3, 95% CI=1.03–1.45) or stroke (RR=1.37, 95% CI=1.04–1.45) and less likely to recognize impairment in patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia than in those with dementia (RR=0.46, 95% CI=0.23–0.72) and in patients with a prior hospitalization for myocardial infarction (RR=0.37, 95% CI=0.09–0.88) or cancer (RR=0.49, 95% CI=0.18–0.90). Conclusion: Medical record documentation reflects physician recognition of dementia, yet physicians are aware of, but have not documented, many patients with milder cognitive impairment. Physicians are unaware of cognitive impairment in more than 40% of their cognitively impaired patients. Additional geriatrics training may promote recognition, but systems solutions are needed to improve recognition critical to provision of emerging therapies for early dementia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ?vital signs? measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly
Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P., & Dokmak, A. (2000) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021::aid-gps234>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 1,794
Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis
Guttman, L. (1954) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289162 · Cited by 1,689
Raskind (2000) · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2261 · Cited by 870
Documentation and Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Primary Care Patients
Callahan, C. M., Hendrie, H. C., & Tierney, W. M. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004 · Cited by 517
The Detection of Dementia in the Primary Care Setting
Valcour, V. G., Masaki, K. H., Curb, J. D., & Blanchette, P. L. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.19.2964 · Cited by 498
Estimated Prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease in the United States
Evans, D. A. (1990) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350099 · Cited by 357
Motor vehicle crashes in dementia of the alzheimer type
Friedland, R. P., Koss, E., Kumar, A., Gaine, S., Metzler, D., Haxby, J. V., & Moore, A. (1988) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410240613 · Cited by 285
Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population
Stutts, J. C., Stewart, J. R., & Martell, C. (1998) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00108-5 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients:
Extermann, M., Aapro, M., Bernabei, R., Cohen, H. J., Droz, J.-P., Lichtman, S., Mor, V., Monfardini, S., Repetto, L., Sørbye, L., et al. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003 · Cited by 1,098
US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens, D. K., Davidson, K. W., Krist, A. H., Barry, M. J., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Doubeni, C. A., Epling, J. W., Kubik, M., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0435 · Cited by 374
Does This Patient Have Dementia?
Holsinger, T., Deveau, J., Boustani, M., & Williams, J. W. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.21.2391 · Cited by 305
Obstacles and opportunities in Alzheimer’s clinical trial recruitment
Watson, J. L., Ryan, L., Silverberg, N., Cahan, V., & Bernard, M. A. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1314 · Cited by 204
Chen, Y., Tysinger, B., Crimmins, E., & Zissimopoulos, J. M. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2019.04.003 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Chodosh, J., Petitti, D. B., Elliott, M., Hays, R. D., Crooks, V. C., Reuben, D. B., Galen Buckwalter, J., & Wenger, N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1051-1059
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1530833367
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician Recognition of Cognitive Impairment: Evaluating the Need for Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52301.x
- The paper
- Chodosh, J., Petitti, D. B., Elliott, M., Hays, R. D., Crooks, V. C., Reuben, D. B., Galen Buckwalter, J., & Wenger, N. (2004). Physician Recognition of Cognitive Impairment: Evaluating the Need for Improvement. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52301.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.