Cited by 204Ethics in Clinical ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Obstacles and opportunities in Alzheimer’s clinical trial recruitment

Open access
Watson, Jennifer L., Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Cahan, Vicky, Bernard, Marie A.·2014·Health Affairs

Abstract

The 2012 National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease set an ambitious goal: to both prevent and effectively treat Alzheimer's disease by 2025. To reach this goal, tens of thousands of volunteers will be needed to participate in clinical trials to test promising new interventions and therapies. To mobilize these volunteers and their health care providers to participate in future clinical trials, it will be necessary to achieve a better understanding of the barriers keeping people from participating in Alzheimer's research; form innovative partnerships among researchers, health care and social service providers, and the public; and develop more-effective outreach strategies. In this article we explore recruitment issues, including those unique to Alzheimer's studies, and we suggest concrete steps such as establishing a structured consortium linking all of the registries of Alzheimer's trials and establishing new partnerships with community and local organizations that can build trust and understanding among patients, caregivers, and providers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1314

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data at preclinical and prodromal stages, particularly longitudinal biomarkers, are critically insufficient due to low screening participation, invasive sampling requirements, and reliance on caregiver-reported cognitive changes.

    “critically insufficient data at preclinical and prodromal stages, particularly longitudinal biomarkers, due to low screening participation, invasive sampling requirements, and reliance on caregiver-reported cognitive changes (Watson et al., 2014)”

    From Multimodal neuroimaging and AI integration in cognitive disorders: advances, challenges, and future directions for precision medicine (2026) · cites this paper as Watson et al., 2014

    The “Challenges To Alzheimer’s Trial Recruitment” section identifies invasive procedures and the need for a study partner to report cognitive changes as recruitment barriers. “New Challenge: Presymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease Trials” says recruiting and screening large numbers of volunteers will be difficult. The paper does not establish that preclinical or prodromal data—particularly longitudinal biomarker data—are critically insufficient, or attribute such a shortage to low screening participation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Weisfeld V English RA Claiborne AB Public engagement and clinical trials: new models and disruptive technologies [Internet] Washington (DC) National Academies Press 2011 2013 Nov 13 Available from: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Public-Engagement-and-Clinical-Trials-New-Models-and-Disruptive-Technologies-Workshop-Summary.aspx

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, J. L., Ryan, L., Silverberg, N., Cahan, V., & Bernard, M. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2014-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
574-579
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2044038526
Cited by
204
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 AG999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, clinical trial recruitment, barriers to participation, research volunteers, community partnerships, outreach strategies, research registry
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Minority Groups, Registries, Patient Selection, Physicians, Primary Care, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review