CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 252Frailty in Older AdultsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty: Development of a Measure Based on Clinical Judgment

Studenski, Stephanie, Hayes, Risa P., Leibowitz, Ruth Q., Bode, Rita, Lavery, Laurie, Walston, Jeremy, Duncan, Pamela, Perera, Subashan·2004·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52423.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives To expand the ability to assess physical frailty by developing a Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty (CGIC-PF) instrument. Design Qualitative and quantitative instrument development. Setting Academic centers. Participant s Six expert panel members, 46 clinicians, 24 patients, and 12 caregivers. Measurements Literature review and structured group processes with experts, clinicians, and consumers were used to generate an initial list of domains and indicators. Structured interviews with clinical experts in the area of frailty were used to establish relevance and feasibility of measurement of domains. Interrater reliability was assessed through a Web-based study. Geriatricians pilot tested the feasibility of the baseline CGIC-PF with 10 patients. Results The CGIC-PF includes six intrinsic domains (mobility, balance, strength, endurance, nutrition, and neuromotor performance) and seven consequences domains (medical complexity, healthcare utilization, appearance, self-perceived health, activities of daily living, emotional status, and social status). Each domain has two to four clinical indicators. Change is scored on a 7-point scale from markedly worse to markedly improved. Average interrater reliability of the CGIC-PF for the Web-based cases was 0.97. Geriatricians completed a baseline CGIC-PF on their own patients in 10 minutes or less. Conclusion The CGIC-PF is a structured assessment of change in physical frailty with defined content and proces…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52423.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 252

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Studenski, S., Hayes, R. P., Leibowitz, R. Q., Bode, R., Lavery, L., Walston, J., Duncan, P., & Perera, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-16
Volume
52
Issue
9
Pages
1560-1566
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
DOI
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52423.x
OpenAlex
W1556601302
Cited by
252
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
physical frailty, Clinical Global Impression of Change, frailty assessment, change measurement, instrument development, inter-rater reliability, geriatric assessment, mobility (physical function), balance, muscle strength, endurance, nutrition, activities of daily living, health care utilization, health perception, emotional state, social status
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Clinical Competence, Disability Evaluation, Postural Balance, Feasibility Studies, Female, Geriatrics, Humans, Judgment, Male, Mental Health, Nutritional Status, Physical Endurance, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Geriatric Assessment, Observer Variation, Frail Elderly, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review