The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty: Development of a Measure Based on Clinical Judgment
Abstract
Objectives To expand the ability to assess physical frailty by developing a Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty (CGIC-PF) instrument. Design Qualitative and quantitative instrument development. Setting Academic centers. Participant s Six expert panel members, 46 clinicians, 24 patients, and 12 caregivers. Measurements Literature review and structured group processes with experts, clinicians, and consumers were used to generate an initial list of domains and indicators. Structured interviews with clinical experts in the area of frailty were used to establish relevance and feasibility of measurement of domains. Interrater reliability was assessed through a Web-based study. Geriatricians pilot tested the feasibility of the baseline CGIC-PF with 10 patients. Results The CGIC-PF includes six intrinsic domains (mobility, balance, strength, endurance, nutrition, and neuromotor performance) and seven consequences domains (medical complexity, healthcare utilization, appearance, self-perceived health, activities of daily living, emotional status, and social status). Each domain has two to four clinical indicators. Change is scored on a 7-point scale from markedly worse to markedly improved. Average interrater reliability of the CGIC-PF for the Web-based cases was 0.97. Geriatricians completed a baseline CGIC-PF on their own patients in 10 minutes or less. Conclusion The CGIC-PF is a structured assessment of change in physical frailty with defined content and proces…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The EFS is shorter than another recent clinical proposal [18] that focused on change”
From Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale (2006) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W. J., Burke, G., et al. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 · Cited by 24,907
Self-citationDevelopment and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O., & Rockwood, K. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9 · Cited by 9,503
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339
Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes
(1976) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188637601200414 · Cited by 2,815
Geary, R. C., & Kendall, M. G. (1949) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226580 · Cited by 2,444
Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/77.4.371 · Cited by 1,525
Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T., & Lee, M. (2000) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.283.13.1715 · Cited by 1,311
Walston, J. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.20.2333 · Cited by 940
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people
Rockwood, K. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051 · Cited by 8,968
Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale
Rolfson, D. B., Majumdar, S. R., Tsuyuki, R. T., Tahir, A., & Rockwood, K. (2006) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afl041 · Cited by 1,643
Walston, J., Hadley, E. C., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Newman, A. B., Studenski, S. A., Ershler, W. B., Harris, T., & Fried, L. P. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x · Cited by 1,605
Self-citationFrailty: An Emerging Research and Clinical Paradigm--Issues and Controversies
Bergman, H., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J., Hogan, D. B., Hummel, S., Karunananthan, S., & Wolfson, C. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/62.7.731 · Cited by 1,134
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties
Gobbens, R. J. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003 · Cited by 1,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Studenski, S., Hayes, R. P., Leibowitz, R. Q., Bode, R., Lavery, L., Walston, J., Duncan, P., & Perera, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-16
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1560-1566
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1556601302
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- physical frailty, Clinical Global Impression of Change, frailty assessment, change measurement, instrument development, inter-rater reliability, geriatric assessment, mobility (physical function), balance, muscle strength, endurance, nutrition, activities of daily living, health care utilization, health perception, emotional state, social status
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Clinical Competence, Disability Evaluation, Postural Balance, Feasibility Studies, Female, Geriatrics, Humans, Judgment, Male, Mental Health, Nutritional Status, Physical Endurance, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Geriatric Assessment, Observer Variation, Frail Elderly, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
