Cited by 206Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home

Morrison, R. Sean, Chichin, Eileen, Carter, John, Burack, Orah, Lantz, Melinda, Meier, Diane E.·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives To assess the effect of a multicomponent advance care planning intervention directed at nursing home social workers on identification and documentation of preferences for medical treatments and on patient outcomes. Design Controlled clinical trial. Setting New York City nursing home. Participants One hundred thirty-nine newly admitted long-term care residents. Intervention Nursing home social workers were randomized to the intervention or control groups. The intervention consisted of baseline education in advance care planning that incorporated small-group workshops and role play/practice sessions for intervention social workers; structured advance care planning discussions with residents and their proxies at admission, after any change in clinical status, and at yearly intervals; formal structured review of residents' goals of care at preexisting regular team meetings; "flagging" of advance directives on nursing home charts; and feedback to individual healthcare providers of the congruence of care they provided and the preferences specified in the advance care planning process. Control social workers received an educational training session on New York State law regarding advance directives but no additional training or interventions. Subjects were enrolled from January 9, 2001 through May 25, 2003 and followed for 6 months after enrollment. Measurements Nursing home chart documentation of advance directives (healthcare proxies, living wills) and do-not-resuscitat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53116.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrison, R. S., Chichin, E., Carter, J., Burack, O., Lantz, M., & Meier, D. E.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Morrison, R. Sean
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-26
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
290-294
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1540773875
Cited by
206
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k07ag000903-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (K07-AG00903, K24AG022345)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, advance directives, advance care planning documentation, goals of care, treatment preferences, do-not-resuscitate orders, artificial nutrition and hydration, treatment concordance, long-term care residents, nursing home admission, health care proxy, living wills, life-sustaining treatment, social work intervention, provider feedback
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Documentation, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Pilot Projects, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Social Work, Patient Satisfaction, Advance Care Planning, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review