Cited by 17Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Extent and determinants of terminally ill cancer patients’ concordance between preferred and received life-sustaining treatment states: an advance care planning randomized trial in Taiwan

Open access
Wen, Fur-Hsing, Chen, Jen-Shi, Chou, Wen-Chi, Chang, Wen-Cheng, Hsieh, Chia-Hsun, Tang, Siew Tzuh·2019·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Promoting patient value-concordant end-of-life care is a priority in health care systems but has rarely been examined in randomized clinical trials. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of an advance care planning intervention in facilitating concordance between cancer patients' preferred and received life-sustaining treatment (LST) states and to explore modifiable factors facilitating or impeding such concordance. Methods Terminal cancer patients (N = 460) were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental and control arms of a randomized clinical trial, with 430 deceased participants comprising the final sample. States of preferred LSTs (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care unit care, chest compression, intubation with mechanical ventilation, intravenous nutrition, and nasogastric tube feeding) and LSTs received in the last month were examined by hidden Markov modeling. Concordance and its modifiable predictors were evaluated by kappa and multivariate logistic regression, respectively. Results We identified three LST-preference states (uniformly preferring LSTs, rejecting LSTs except intravenous nutrition support, and mixed LST preferences) and three received LST states (uniformly receiving LSTs, received intravenous nutrition only, and selectively receiving LSTs). Concordance was not significantly higher in the experimental than the control arm (kappa [95% CI]: 0.126 [0.032, 0.221] vs. 0.050 [-0.028, 0.128]; arm difference: odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.008 [0.675…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.010

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, F.-H., Chen, J.-S., Chou, W.-C., Chang, W.-C., Hsieh, C.-H., & Tang, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Soochow University (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Tang, Siew Tzuh
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
1-10.e10
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936061317
Cited by
17
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX106-10208PI)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (105-2314-B-182-040-MY3)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (BMRP888)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, terminal cancer patients, life-sustaining treatment, end-of-life care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care, mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, nasogastric tube feeding, prognostic awareness, quality of life, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hidden Markov models
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Life Support Care, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Taiwan, Terminal Care, Terminally Ill, Advance Care Planning, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review