Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

End‐of‐Life Care in Black and White: Race Matters for Medical Care of Dying Patients and their Families

Welch, Lisa C., Teno, Joan M., Mor, Vincent·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the end‐of‐life medical care experienced by African‐American and white decedents and their families. Design: Cross‐sectional, retrospective survey with weighted results based on a two‐stage probability sampling design. Setting: Hospitals, nursing homes, and home‐based medical services across the United States. Participants: Surrogates (N=1,447; primarily family members) for decedents from 22 states. Measurements: Validated end‐of‐life care outcomes concerning symptom management, decision‐making, informing and supporting families, individualized care, coordination, service utilization, and financial impact. Results: Family members of African‐American decedents were less likely than those of white decedents to rate the care received as excellent or very good (odds ratio (OR)=0.4). They were more likely to report absent (OR=2.4) or problematic (OR=1.9) physician communication, concerns with being informed (OR=2.5), and concerns with family support (OR=2.6). Family members of African Americans were less likely than those of whites to report that the decedent had treatment wishes (OR=0.3) or written advance care planning documents (OR=0.4). These differences persist when limiting the sample to respondents whose expectations for life‐sustaining treatments matched treatments received. Family members of African‐American decedents also were more likely to report financial hardship due to savings depletion (OR=2.1) or difficulty paying for care (OR=2.0) and that family/friends (OR=2.0) or home health workers (OR=1.9) provided home care. Conclusion: This national study brings evidence that racial disparities persist into end‐of‐life care, particularly regarding communication and family needs. Results also suggest different home care patterns and levels of financial impact.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53357.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Welch, L. C., Teno, J. M., & Mor, V.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1145-1153
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1565808448
Cited by
259
References
35
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End‐of‐Life Care in Black and White: Race Matters for Medical Care of Dying Patients and their Families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53357.x
The paper
Welch, L. C., Teno, J. M., & Mor, V. (2005). End‐of‐Life Care in Black and White: Race Matters for Medical Care of Dying Patients and their Families. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53357.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.