Cited by 58Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health Studies

Dietary Supplementation and Quality of Life of Older Patients: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Gariballa, Salah, Forster, Sarah·2007·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives To test the effect of nutritional support on older patient's quality of life. Design Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from March 2001 to January 2004. Setting United Kingdom. Participants Two hundred twenty-five hospitalized acutely ill older patients. Intervention Normal hospital diet plus 400-mL oral nutritional supplements daily for 6 weeks. The composition of the supplement was such as to provide 995 kcal for energy and 100% of the Reference Nutrient Intakes for a healthy older person for vitamins and minerals. Measurements Baseline, 6-week, and 6-month nutritional status and quality of life. Results Randomization to the supplement group led to significantly better quality-of-life scores than in the placebo group at 6 months but not at 6 weeks, after adjustment for baseline quality of life, age, and sex. The effect of supplementation was seen in higher physical function, role physical, and social function scores. Corresponding treatment effects were 7.0 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.5-13.6, P=.04), 10.2 (95% CI=0.1-20.2, P=.047), and 7.8 (95% CI=0.0-15.5, P=.05), respectively. There was no evidence of difference in Barthel scores at 6 months. Conclusion Oral nutritional supplementation of acutely ill hospitalized older patients led to a statistically significant benefit in quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01435.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ONS containing 995 kcal from macronutrients and covering 100% of the RDA for healthy older adults in vitamins and minerals had no other effect on cognitive performance in older medical inpatients.

    “In addition, provision of ONS containing 995 kcal from macronutrients and covering 100% of the RDA for healthy older adults in vitamins and minerals led to a lower incidence of depressive symptoms (p ¼ 0.021) in older medical inpatients, with no other effect on their cognitive performance but with a significant positive effect on their self-reported QoL”
  • The ONS containing 995 kcal from macronutrients and covering 100% of the RDA for healthy older adults in vitamins and minerals had a significant positive effect on self-reported quality of life (treatment effect in QoL scores using the SF-36 form at 6 months was 7.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.6, p=0.04 for physical function, 10.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 20.2, p=0.047 for role physical, and 7.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 15.5,

    “with a significant positive effect on their self-reported QoL (i.e. the treatment effect in QoL scores using the SF-36 form at 6 months was 7.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.6, p ¼ 0.04 for physical function, 10.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 20.2, p ¼ 0.047 for role physical, and 7.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 15.5, p ¼ 0.05 for social function domains, compared to placebo) [40,41] (Level of evidence 1þþ for both).”
  • Provision of ONS containing 995 kcal from macronutrients and covering 100% of the RDA for healthy older adults in vitamins and minerals led to a lower incidence of depressive symptoms (p=0.021) in older medical inpatients.

    “In addition, provision of ONS containing 995 kcal from macronutrients and covering 100% of the RDA for healthy older adults in vitamins and minerals led to a lower incidence of depressive symptoms (p ¼ 0.021) in older medical inpatients, with no other effect on their cognitive performance but with a significant positive effect on their self-reported QoL”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gariballa, S., & Forster, S.
Affiliations
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
2030-2034
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1587377947
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
oral nutritional supplementation, elderly patients, quality of life, hospitalized older adults, acute illness, nutritional status, physical function, social function, role physical, Barthel Index
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Placebos, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review