Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 659

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review

Gorecki, Claudia, Brown, Julia M., Nelson, E. Andrea, Briggs, Michelle, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Dealey, Carol, Defloor, Tom, Nixon, Jane, on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group·2009·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of pressure ulcers (PUs) and PU interventions on health‐related quality of life (HRQL). DESIGN: Systematic review and metasynthesis of primary research reporting the impact of PU and PU interventions on HRQL according to direct patient reports. Quality assessment criteria were developed and applied. Data extraction identified findings in the form of direct quotes from patients or questionnaire items and domain results. Combined synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research was performed using content analysis to generate categories and themes from findings. Thirteen electronic databases were searched, and hand searching, cross‐referencing, contact with experts, and an online search was undertaken. No language restrictions were applied. SETTING: Adults with PUs in acute, community, and long‐term care settings across Europe, the United States, Asia, and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty‐one studies including 2,463 participants with PUs were included in the review. Ages ranged from 17 to 96. RESULTS: The review included 10 qualitative and 21 quantitative studies; 293 findings, 46 categories, and 11 themes emerged. The 11 HRQL themes were physical impact, social impact, psychological effect, PU symptoms, general health, and other impacts of PUs: healthcare professional–client relationships, need for versus effect of interventions, impact on others, financial impact, perceived etiology, and need for knowledge. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that PUs and PU interventions have a significant impact on HRQL and cause substantial burden to patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 659

Metadata

Authors
Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T., Nixon, J., & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
1175-1183
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2116654531
Cited by
659
References
27
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x
The paper
Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T., Nixon, J., & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group. (2009). Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.