The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of pressure ulcers (PUs) and PU interventions on health‐related quality of life (HRQL). DESIGN: Systematic review and metasynthesis of primary research reporting the impact of PU and PU interventions on HRQL according to direct patient reports. Quality assessment criteria were developed and applied. Data extraction identified findings in the form of direct quotes from patients or questionnaire items and domain results. Combined synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research was performed using content analysis to generate categories and themes from findings. Thirteen electronic databases were searched, and hand searching, cross‐referencing, contact with experts, and an online search was undertaken. No language restrictions were applied. SETTING: Adults with PUs in acute, community, and long‐term care settings across Europe, the United States, Asia, and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty‐one studies including 2,463 participants with PUs were included in the review. Ages ranged from 17 to 96. RESULTS: The review included 10 qualitative and 21 quantitative studies; 293 findings, 46 categories, and 11 themes emerged. The 11 HRQL themes were physical impact, social impact, psychological effect, PU symptoms, general health, and other impacts of PUs: healthcare professional–client relationships, need for versus effect of interventions, impact on others, financial impact, perceived etiology, and need for knowledge. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that PUs and PU interventions have a significant impact on HRQL and cause substantial burden to patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.078 · Cited by 1,382
Self-citationSystematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · Cited by 756
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine
Badenoch, D., & Mbe (2003) · Cited by 586
A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life
Herber, O. R., Schnepp, W., & Rieger, M. A. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-44 · Cited by 370
Pressure Ulcer Risk Factors Among Hospitalized Patients With Activity Limitation
Allman, R. M. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520350047027 · Cited by 360
Pressure Ulcers in Community-Resident Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: Prevalence and Risk Factors
Führer, M. J., Garber, S. L., Rintala, D. H., Clearman, R., & Hart, K. A. (1993) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(23)00010-2 · Cited by 306
Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews
Pearson, A. (2004) · JBI Reports · doi:10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00008.x · Cited by 305
Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies
Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., Jones, D. R., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2004) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-5 · Cited by 295
Patient stories of living with a pressure ulcer
Hopkins, A., Dealey, C., Bale, S., Defloor, T., & Worboys, F. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04007.x · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Cited by
Age-associated skin conditions and diseases: Current perspectives and future options
Blume-Peytavi, U., Kottner, J., Sterry, W., Hodin, M. W., Griffiths, T. W., Watson, R. E. B., Hay, R. J., & Griffiths, C. E. M. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw003 · Cited by 221
A meta-ethnography of patients’ experience of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain
Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., Andrews, J., & Barker, K. (2013) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr01120 · Cited by 98
Self-citationStern, A., Mitsakakis, N., Paulden, M., Alibhai, S., Wong, J., Tomlinson, G., Brooker, A.-S., Krahn, M., & Zwarenstein, M. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-83 · Cited by 94
Social participation of people with chronic wounds: a systematic review
Klein, T. M., Andrees, V., Kirsten, N., Protz, K., Augustin, M., & Blome, C. (2021) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13533 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T., Nixon, J., & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-30
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1175-1183
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2116654531
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x
- The paper
- Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T., Nixon, J., & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group. (2009). Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.