The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A systematic review was conducted to analyse journal articles that describe or measure the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life (QoL) in order to improve the content of an educational programme that aims to enhance self-care agency in leg ulcer patients. METHOD: Original articles published in English and German between 1990 and 2006 were included if the findings were analysed at the level of patients. Articles were excluded if (1) they investigated the impact of specific treatments or settings on QoL or (2) focused mainly on arterial ulcers or diabetic foot ulcers. RESULTS: Twenty-four original research articles met the inclusion criteria; 11 studies used a quantitative, 11 studies a qualitative, and 2 used a mixed method approach. The findings were collapsed into 5 core domains. Quantitative studies commonly investigated the parameters of pain, sleep, social isolation, and physical mobility. Patients had significantly more pain, more restrictions regarding social functioning, less vitality, and limitations with respect to emotional roles compared to the respective controls. Other problem areas identified were restrictions in work capacity, recreation, social interaction, psychological well-being, as well as problems caused by treatment regimes. Inconclusive results were obtained regarding pain intensity, physical restrictions, and gender effects. LIMITATIONS: Numerous original studies neither undertook a differentiation of participants by ulcer aetiology nor did they analyse the results according to gender differences. CONCLUSION: As leg ulceration has an impact on QoL, national guidelines on the treatment of leg ulceration need to more specifically address these far-ranging effects identified in this review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42 · Cited by 2,336
Cited by
Compression for venous leg ulcers
O'Meara, S., Cullum, N., Nelson, E. A., & Dumville, J. C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000265.pub3 · Cited by 929
Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review
Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T., Nixon, J., & on behalf of the European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x · Cited by 659
Hannes, K., & Macaitis, K. (2012) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794111432992 · Cited by 320
The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review
Green, J., Jester, R., McKinley, R., & Pooler, A. (2014) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.601 · Cited by 256
Social participation of people with chronic wounds: a systematic review
Klein, T. M., Andrees, V., Kirsten, N., Protz, K., Augustin, M., & Blome, C. (2021) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13533 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Herber, O. R., Schnepp, W., & Rieger, M. A.
- Venue
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Published
- 2007-07-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-44
- ISSN
- 1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142081066
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1477-7525-5-44
- The paper
- Herber, O. R., Schnepp, W., & Rieger, M. A. (2007). A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.