Cited by 44Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Nonsteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs, Aspirin, and Cognitive Function in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

Open access
Waldstein, Shari R., Wendell, Carrington Rice, Seliger, Stephen L., Ferrucci, Luigi, Metter, E. Jeffrey, Zonderman, Alan B.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relations between the use of nonaspirin, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin and age‐related change in multiple domains of cognitive function in community‐dwelling individuals without dementia. DESIGN: Longitudinal, with measures obtained on one to 18 occasions over up to 45 years. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: A volunteer sample of up to 2,300 participants from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging free of diagnosed dementia. MEASUREMENTS: At each visit, reported NSAID or aspirin use (yes/no) and tests of verbal and visual memory, attention, perceptuo‐motor speed, confrontation naming, executive function, and mental status. RESULTS: Mixed‐effects regression models revealed that NSAID use was associated with less prospective decline on the Blessed Information‐Memory‐Concentration (I‐M‐C) Test, a mental status test weighted for memory and concentration ( P <.001), and Part B of the Trail Making Test, a test of perceptuo‐motor speed and mental flexibility ( P <.05). In contrast, aspirin use was related to greater prospective decline on the Blessed I‐M‐C Test ( P <.05) and the Benton Visual Retention Test, a test of visual memory ( P <.001). CONCLUSION: Consistent with studies of incident dementia, NSAID users without dementia displayed less prospective decline in cognitive function, but on only two cognitive measures. In contrast, aspirin use was associated with greater prospective cognitive decline on select measures, potentially reflecting its common use for vascular disease prophylaxis. Effect sizes were small, calling into question clinical significance, although overall public health significance may be meaningful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02618.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational research links greater physical activity to better cognitive function.

    “The same beneficial effects of increased physical activity on cognitive function have also been documented in observational studies,472 but only 1 small intervention trial has followed up subjects for cognitive improvement after increasing physical exercise.”

    From Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2011) · cites this paper as [472]

    The Results and Discussion report associations between NSAID or aspirin use and cognitive performance, not between physical activity and cognitive function. Searches for physical activity and exercise found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed observational link; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Hebert R Lindsay J Verreault R Vascular dementia: incidence and risk factors in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Stroke 2000 31 1487 1493 10884442

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waldstein, S. R., Wendell, C. R., Seliger, S. L., Ferrucci, L., Metter, E. J., & Zonderman, A. B.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Metter, E. Jeffrey
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
38-43
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1531921250
Cited by
44
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (Z01AG000185)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, cognitive decline, cognitive function, aging, dementia, memory, visual memory, executive function, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Aspirin, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review