Cited by 15Philosophy and History of ScienceQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

INTERVENTIONISM, CONTROL VARIABLES AND CAUSATION IN THE QUALITATIVE WORLD

Campbell, John·2008·Philosophical Issues

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2008.00155.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge of higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system.

    “It is well-received in both the philosophical and the computer science literature that knowledge of such higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system”

    From AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy (2022) · cites this paper as Campbell, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, John
Venue
Philosophical Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
426-445
ISSN
  • 1533-6077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-2237
OpenAlex
W2032456414
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
interventionism, control variables, causality, causal models, counterfactuals, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review