Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A propensity score case‐control comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery

Karkouti, Keyvan, Beattie, W. Scott, Dattilo, Kathleen M., McCluskey, Stuart A., Ghannam, Mohammed, Hamdy, Ahmed, Wijeysundera, Duminda N., Fedorko, Ludwik, Yau, Terrence M.·2006·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass may result in excessive fibrinolysis and platelet (PLT) dysfunction, resulting in impaired hemostasis and excessive blood loss. Prophylactic use of the antifibrinolytic drugs aprotinin and tranexamic acid is thought to prevent these hemostatic defects. Their relative clinical utility and safety in high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery, however, is not known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using propensity scores, 449 patients who received aprotinin for high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery were matched to 449 patients who received tranexamic acid from a pool of 10,870 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single center, 586 of whom received aprotinin and the remainder of whom received tranexamic acid. RESULTS: The two matched groups were well balanced in terms of measured perioperative variables. Blood product transfusion rates were similar in the aprotinin and tranexamic acid groups: red blood cells, 79 percent versus 76 percent (p = 0.3); PLTs, 56 percent versus 50 percent (p = 0.06); and plasma, 66 percent versus 61 percent (p = 0.1). Adverse events rates were comparable in the two groups, except for renal dysfunction (defined as a greater than 50% increase in creatinine concentration during the first postoperative week to >100 µmol/L in women and >110 µmol/L in men or a new requirement for dialysis support), which occurred in 24 percent (107/449) of aprotinin patients and 17 percent (75/449) of tranexamic acid patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin and tranexamic acid have similar hemostatic effectiveness in high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery. Within the confines of propensity score matching, our results suggest that aprotinin may be associated with renal dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00724.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Karkouti, K., Beattie, W. S., Dattilo, K. M., McCluskey, S. A., Ghannam, M., Hamdy, A., Wijeysundera, D. N., Fedorko, L., & Yau, T. M.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-20
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
327-338
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W1978691495
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
35.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A propensity score case‐control comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00724.x
The paper
Karkouti, K., Beattie, W. S., Dattilo, K. M., McCluskey, S. A., Ghannam, M., Hamdy, A., Wijeysundera, D. N., Fedorko, L., & Yau, T. M. (2006). A propensity score case‐control comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high‐transfusion‐risk cardiac surgery. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00724.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.