More on: normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
A “Percent Correction” Formula for Evaluation of Mixing Studies
Chang, S.-H., Tillema, V., & Scherr, D. (2002) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/rrek-8l6m-d2kc-hwlh · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationNormal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant
Thom, J., Ivey, L., & Eikelboom, J. (2003) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2003.0543h.x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Chang, S.
- Affiliations
- Marshfield Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1480-1481
- ISSN
- 1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054237185
- Semantic Scholar
- 2f6bba5f893d940b5cd34520e3cace6fca935746
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, anticoagulants
- MeSH terms
- Blood Coagulation Tests, Humans, Lupus Vulgaris, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Phospholipids, Plasma, Case-Control Studies, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review