Cited by 628Disaster Management and ResilienceFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementAgricultural risk and resilience

Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Adaptation to Environmental Risk: A Case Study of Climate Change and Flooding in Bangladesh

Open access
Brouwer, Roy, Akter, Sonia, Brander, Luke, Haque, Enamul·2007·Risk Analysis

Abstract

In this article we investigate the complex relationship between environmental risk, poverty, and vulnerability in a case study carried out in one of the poorest and most flood‐prone countries in the world, focusing on household and community vulnerability and adaptive coping mechanisms. Based upon the steadily growing amount of literature in this field we develop and test our own analytical model. In a large‐scale household survey carried out in southeast Bangladesh, we ask almost 700 floodplain residents living without any flood protection along the River Meghna about their flood risk exposure, flood problems, flood damage, and coping mechanisms. Novel in our study is the explicit testing of the effectiveness of adaptive coping strategies to reduce flood damage costs. We show that, households with lower income and less access to productive natural assets face higher exposure to risk of flooding. Disparity in income and asset distribution at community level furthermore tends to be higher at higher risk exposure levels, implying that individually vulnerable households are also collectively more vulnerable. Regarding the identification of coping mechanisms to deal with flood events, we look at both the ex ante household level preparedness for flood events and the ex post availability of community‐level support and disaster relief. We find somewhat paradoxically that the people that face the highest risk of flooding are the least well prepared, both in terms of household‐level ex ante preparedness and community‐level ex post flood relief.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., & Haque, E.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • North South University (BD)
  • East West University (BD)
Corresponding author
Brouwer, Roy
Venue
Risk Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
313-326
ISSN
  • 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6924
OpenAlex
W2143698767
Cited by
628
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
30.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
Keywords
socioeconomic vulnerability, climate change adaptation, floods, flood risk exposure, poverty, household preparedness, disaster relief, income inequality, flood damage costs, Bangladesh
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adult, Bangladesh, Disaster Planning, Disasters, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Relief Work, Risk, Social Class, Greenhouse Effect, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review