The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks
Abstract
Conflicts regarding the siting of hazardous facilities in the U.S. have often led to an impasse due to numerous problems, particularly including social distrust. To address this situation, this article proposes a multidimensional conception of trust, including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects, and involving themes of expectations about others, subjective perceptions of situations, and awareness of taking risks. Four key dimensions of trust are perceptions of commitment, competence, caring, and predictability. Distrust arises from violations of expectations that people have in social relations. Research has shown a broad loss of trust in leaders and in major social institutions in the U.S. since the 1960s, together with growing public concern over health, safety, and environmental protection. These trends combine to make hazardous‐facility siting highly controversial. This article recommends key steps in risk communication and hazardous‐facility siting that are aimed at dealing as effectively as possible with social distrust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146
Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525 · Cited by 1,990
The social control of impersonal trust
Shapiro, S. P. (1987) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228791 · Cited by 1,725
Cited by
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00373 · Cited by 721
What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x · Cited by 668
Changing Medical Organization and the Erosion of Trust
Mechanic, D. (1996) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350245 · Cited by 503
The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk
Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., & Marsh, R. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00062 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 161-187
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2074627809
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x
- The paper
- Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.