Cited by 29Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEmotional Labor in ProfessionsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Emotional Climate in Organizations: Applications in Latin American Prisons

Ruiz, José Ignacio·2007·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Two studies in Latin American prisons analyzed the relation between emotional climate and subclimates, organizational culture, stress, coping, and social support. In the first study, emotional climate was measured in prisons in three different countries by asking employees and prisoners how they perceived the climate in their own group and how they perceived the climate in the outgroup. Employees perceived more positive and less negative emotions in their own group than the prisoners perceived in theirs. The employees correctly perceived high levels of loneliness and sadness in the prisoner group but perceived more guilt and anger and less hope than inmates reported. Within their own group, detainees perceived less joy and confidence in the institution and much more sadness and loneliness than did employees. Participation in institutional activities was associated with a more positive emotional climate. In a second study, using data compiled from five different prisons, it was again found that prisoners perceived high amounts of sadness and loneliness. A negative balance of climate among detainees was associated with a violent and avoidance subculture and with a negative climate among employees. A more positive balance of climate was associated negatively with PTSD and avoidance coping and positively with internal locus of control and subjective social support. The results suggest the importance of distinguishing between positive and negative emotional climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00509.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Objective social isolation can influence perceptions of isolation, but perceived isolation relates more to interaction quality than quantity.

    “Studies using these assessments indicate that objective social isolation can affect perceptions of isolation,23,24 but show that perceived social isolation is more closely related to the quality than the quantity of social interactions.25”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz, J. I.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
289-306
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2057431364
Cited by
29
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
emotional climate, prisons, prisoners, prison staff, organizational culture, stress, coping, social support, loneliness, sadness, guilt, hope, institutional activities, post-traumatic stress disorder, avoidance coping, locus of control, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review