The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production
Open accessAbstract
The role of conversational interactions in the development of a second language has been central in the recent second language acquisition literature. While a great deal is now known about the way in which nonnative speakers interact with native speakers and other nonnative speakers, little is known about the lasting effects of these interactions on a nonnative's linguistic development. This paper specifically investigates the relationship among input, interaction, and second language production. Through data from native–nonnative speaker interactions in a direction-giving task, we show that both modified input and interaction affect task performance. However, only interaction has an effect on subsequent task performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“That is, how can a learner's attention be brought to language forms? It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss this concept in any detail (cf. Gass, 1988; Schmidt, 1990); however, three aspects are important: form-focused instruction, frequency, and saliency.”
BackgroundDoughty, C. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010287 · Cited by 619
Errors, Interaction, and Correction: A Study of Native-Nonnative Conversations
Chun, A. E., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., & Luppescu, S. (1982) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586471 · Cited by 120
Learner and Teacher Roles in the Treatment of Oral Error in Group Work
Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368828001100204 · Cited by 78
Cited by
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772
Spada, N. (1997) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444800012799 · Cited by 632
HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK?
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004010 · Cited by 630
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-302
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2119274157
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 63.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0272263100013097
- The paper
- Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100013097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
