The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Synchronous CMC on Speaking Proficiency and Anxiety: Text Versus Voice Chat
Open accessAbstract
This article reports on a study investigating the use of 2 synchronous computer‐mediated communication tools: text and voice chat. The experimental design employed 3 groups (text, voice, and control), each consisting of 30 novice‐level secondary school learners of English as a foreign language. Over a 4‐week period, the participants in the experimental groups engaged in 40–45‐minute‐long chat sessions in dyads, guided by a total of 8 tasks. The data were collected through preanxiety and postanxiety scales and speaking tests, and the participants' perspectives were investigated through the use of closed and open‐ended questionnaires. The results showed that the speaking proficiency of both experimental groups increased, whereas there was a decrease in the anxiety levels only for the text chat group. The results were then interpreted by taking into consideration the data from the questionnaires, and a protocol was proposed for the selection of tools for different learner groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety
HORWITZ, E. K., HORWITZ, M. B., & COPE, J. (1986) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x · Cited by 5,697
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“The theory is based on several hypotheses in SLA research: the input hypothesis (Krashen, 1985), the interaction hypothesis (Long, 1983), the output hypothesis (Swain, 1985), and the noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 1990).”
BackgroundSpeaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,003
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,008
Task-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Mackey, A. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104293056 · Cited by 2,843
Input in Second Language Acquisition
Bottigheimer, R. B., Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (1986) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327330 · Cited by 2,332
A Framework for Task-Based Learning
Yuan, F., & Willis, J. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588204 · Cited by 1,975
Cited by
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Botes, E., Dewaele, J.-M., & Greiff, S. (2020) · Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning · doi:10.52598/jpll/2/1/3 · Cited by 333
The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate
Lee, J. S. (2022) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- SATAR, H. M., & ÖZDENER, N.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-19
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 595-613
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2134174483
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 50.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Synchronous CMC on Speaking Proficiency and Anxiety: Text Versus Voice Chat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
- The paper
- SATAR, H. M., & ÖZDENER, N. (2008). The Effects of Synchronous CMC on Speaking Proficiency and Anxiety: Text Versus Voice Chat. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.