Cited by 461EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Effective Foreign Language Teaching: A Comparison of Ideals

BROWN, ALAN V.·2009·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

Foreign language (FL) teachers and students may have very similar or disparate notions of effective teaching, and the intersection of the two sets of beliefs has ramifications for language learning and the effectiveness of instruction. Horwitz (1990), Kern (1995), and Schulz (1996) have argued that mismatches between FL students' and teachers' expectations can negatively affect the students' satisfaction with the language class and can potentially lead to the discontinuation of study. The principal objectives of this study were to identify and compare, overall and by teacher, teachers' and students' ideals of effective teacher behaviors. Of 83 intact 1st‐ and 2nd‐year classes across 9 languages at the University of Arizona, 49 FL teachers and their students responded to a 24‐item Likert‐scale questionnaire covering several areas of FL pedagogy. The students seemed to favor a grammar‐based approach, whereas their teachers preferred a more communicative classroom, as evidenced by significant differences in such areas as target language use, error correction, and group work. The significant discrepancies between teacher and student beliefs in several relevant areas point to the need for FL teachers to seek out their students' perspectives actively and to engage them in brief classroom discussions about the rationale behind certain instructional strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive beliefs may incline learners to be more receptive to interaction in the classroom, thereby increasing its benefits.

    “Such positive beliefs may incline learners to be more receptive to interaction in the classroom, thereby increasing its benefits (see also Lasagabaster & Sierra 2005;Brown 2009).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Brown 2009

Authors
BROWN, A. V.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
BROWN, ALAN V.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-09
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
46-60
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2026260360
Cited by
461
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
FWCI
153.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
foreign language teaching, teacher beliefs, student perceptions, teaching effectiveness, grammar instruction, communicative language teaching, error correction, target language use, group work, student satisfaction, language learning motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review