Cited by 135EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Modeling Teacher Beliefs and Practices in Context: A Multimethods Approach

NISHINO, TAKAKO·2012·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship among Japanese high school teachers’ beliefs, their practices, and socioeducational factors regarding communicative language teaching (CLT). A multimethods approach was used consisting of a survey, interviews, and class observations. A Teacher Beliefs Questionnaire was sent to 188 randomly selected Japanese high schools, and 139 teachers responded. Additionally, 12 English classes taught by 4 Japanese high school teachers were observed, focusing on how they used communicative activities. The same 4 teachers were later interviewed. A path model based on Borg's (2003) conceptual framework of teacher cognition was tested. The best‐fitting model indicated that Student‐Related Communicative Conditions directly impacted Classroom Practices, Positive CLT Beliefs indirectly influenced Classroom Practices via CLT Self‐Efficacy, and Exam‐Related Expectations both directly and indirectly affected Classroom Practices. Findings from the interviews and observations revealed that the participants’ learning experiences, in‐service training, and contextual factors (e.g., university entrance examinations) influenced their beliefs and practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01364.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nishino's (2012) observations of four Japanese teachers (12 observations) do not appear to have fed into the interview questions she asked.

    “Nor do Nishino's (2012) observations of four Japanese teachers (3 of each teacher, 12 observations in total) appear to have fed into the interview questions she asked.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NISHINO, T.
Affiliations
Kanda University of International Studies (JP)
Corresponding author
NISHINO, TAKAKO
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
380-399
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2162645950
Cited by
131
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
42.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
teacher beliefs, communicative language teaching, English language teaching, secondary school teachers, Japanese teachers, teacher cognition, teaching practice, continuing teacher education, college entrance examination, path analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review