CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,513Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EMOTION REGULATION: INFLUENCES OF ATTACHMENT RELATIONSHIPS

Cassidy, Jude·2008·Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01287.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Emotion regulation and quality of attachment are closely linked. It has been proposed here that one influence on individual differences in emotion regulation may be a child's attachment history. Individuals characterized by the flexible ability to accept and integrate both positive and negative emotions are generally securely attached; on the other hand, individuals characterized by either limited or heightened negative affect are more likely to be insecurely attached. While acknowledging the role of infant temperament, I have focused on the role of social factors in examining the link between emotion regulation and attachment. The approach to emotion regulation taken here--that emotion regulation is adaptive in helping a child attain her goals--is esentially a functionalist approach (Bretherton et al., 1986; Campos et al., 1983), consistent with earlier views of emotions as important regulators of interpersonal relationships (Charlesworth, 1982; Izard, 1977). It has been proposed that patterns of emotion regulation serve an important function for the infant: the function of maintaining the relationship with the attachment figure. Emotion regulation has been described as serving this function in two ways. First, the function of maintaining the relationship is thought to be served when infant emotion regulation contributes to the infant's more generalized regulation of the attachment system in response to experiences with the caregiver. Infants who have experienced rejection (insecure/avoidant infants) are thought to minimize negative affect in order to avoid the risk of further rejection. Infants whose mothers have been relatively unavailable or inconsistently available (insecure/ambivalent infants) are thought to maximize negative affect in order to increase the likelihood of gaining the attention of a frequently unavailable caregiver. Both these patterns of emotion regulation help ensure that the child will remain close to the parent and thereby be protected. Second, the function of maintaining the attachment relationship is thought to be served when the infant signals to the parent that she will cooperate in helping maintain the parent's own state of mind in relation to attachment. The minimizing of negative affect of the avoidant infant signals that the infant will not seek caregiving that would interfere with the parent's dismissal of attachment. The heightened negative emotionality of the ambivalent infant signals to the parent that the infant needs her and thus helps maintain a state of mind in which attachment is emphasized. The approach to emotion regulation presented here is congruent with much work examining the socialization of emotions (Lewis & Saarni, 1985; Thompson, 1990).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01287.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cassidy, J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cassidy, Jude
ORCID
Cassidy, Jude
Venue
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1994-02
Volume
59
Issue
2-3
Pages
228-249
ISSN
  • 0037-976X (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5834
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01287.x
OpenAlex
W2168446502
Cited by
1,513
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 65
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
emotion regulation, attachment, attachment security, insecure attachment, attachment avoidance, ambivalent attachment, infant temperament, negative affect, caregiver availability, rejection, attachment system, emotion socialization, individual differences
MeSH terms
Affect, Child, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review