Cited by 58Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Early Trauma, negative affect, and anxious attachment: the role of metacognition

Myers, Samuel G., Wells, Adrian·2015·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Metacognition is linked to the etiology and maintenance of negative emotions and psychological disorder in the Self-Regulatory Executive Function Model. Although there is significant evidence supporting the model, little is currently known about the situational factors for developing dysfunctional metacognitions. The current study explored the hypothesis that early aversive experiences might be important and also tested if metacognitions could mediate the relationship between such experiences and psychological symptoms. DESIGN AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifty non-clinical adults completed a retrospective early trauma measure, as well as measures of current metacognitive beliefs, negative affect, and anxious attachment. RESULTS: Early emotional abuse positively and significantly correlated with several metacognitive belief dimensions but other forms of early trauma did not. Metacognition fully mediated the relationship between emotional abuse and negative affect. Anxious attachment was also positively and significantly associated with metacognitive beliefs and specific relationships remained after controlling for early emotional abuse and current negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with the ideas that: (i) early negative experiences, and emotional abuse in particular, could be a factor in the formation of problematic metacognitions and (ii) these metacognitions may be important in determining the effects of abuse on subsequent psychological symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2015.1009832

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary evaluations of metacognitive beliefs in children and adolescent non-clinical samples highlight that, similar to adults, metacognitive beliefs positively relate to anxiety and depression.

    “However, preliminary evaluations of metacognitive beliefs in children and adolescent non-clinical samples highlight that similar to adults, metacognitive beliefs positively relate to anxiety and depression [79, 80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, S. G., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Myers, Samuel G.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
634-649
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2041407245
Cited by
58
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
early trauma, emotional abuse, metacognition, metacognitive beliefs, negative affect, attachment anxiety, Self-Regulatory Executive Function model, mediation, psychological symptoms, childhood adversity
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review