The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory*
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 · Cited by 5,720
Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 · Cited by 1,070
Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12349 · Cited by 789
The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem
Ansari, S. (., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2442 · Cited by 556
A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Markides, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-25
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2050520842
- Cited by
- 1,199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x
- The paper
- Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
