The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Scaling Model for Estimating Time‐Series Party Positions from Texts
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in computational content analysis have provided scholars promising new ways for estimating party positions. However, existing text‐based methods face challenges in producing valid and reliable time‐series data. This article proposes a scaling algorithm called WORDFISH to estimate policy positions based on word frequencies in texts. The technique allows researchers to locate parties in one or multiple elections. We demonstrate the algorithm by estimating the positions of German political parties from 1990 to 2005 using word frequencies in party manifestos. The extracted positions reflect changes in the party system more accurately than existing time‐series estimates. In addition, the method allows researchers to examine which words are important for placing parties on the left and on the right. We find that words with strong political connotations are the best discriminators between parties. Finally, a series of robustness checks demonstrate that the estimated positions are insensitive to distributional assumptions and document selection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Slapin and Proksch (2008) show, the estimates in the left-hand plot separate the German parties and replicate expert assessments of German party movement over time.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Slapin and Proksch 2008
In the citing paper
“First Monroe and Maeda (2004), then later Slapin and Proksch (2008), introduce statistical models based on item response theory (IRT) to automatically estimate the spatial location of the parties.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Slapin and Proksch 2008
In the citing paper
“we replicate an example from Slapin and Proksch (2008) that shows that the model works well with German political platforms.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Slapin and Proksch 2008
In the citing paper
“Slapin and Proksch (2008) develop their method, wordfish, as a Poisson-IRT model.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Slapin and Proksch 2008
In the citing paper
“A second method is an unsupervised method for locating actors in space (Monroe and Maeda 2004;Slapin and Proksch 2008).”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Slapin and Proksch 2008
Citations
Cites
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
Regression Analysis of Count Data: Author Index
Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814365 · Cited by 6,406
The EM Algorithm and Extensions
Kushary, D., McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271189 · Cited by 5,419
Tsebelis, G. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831456 · Cited by 3,531
Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work
Giné, V. L., & Tsebelis, G. (2003) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.2307/40184562 · Cited by 3,361
A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification
McCallum, A., & Nigam, K. (1998) · Cited by 3,289
Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval
Lewis, D. D. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026666 · Cited by 2,140
Partisan Politics in the Global Economy
Garrett, G. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625633 · Cited by 1,864
Party Policy in Modern Democracies
Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203028179 · Cited by 1,616
Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998
Budge, I., Klingemann, H., Volkens, A., Bara, J. L., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,508
Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data
LAVER, M., BENOIT, K., & GARRY, J. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000698 · Cited by 1,377
The Oxford handbook of political economy
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5865 · Cited by 1,331
Budge, I., Klingemann, H., Volkens, A., Bara, J. L., Tanenbaum, E., Fording, R. C., Hearl, D. J., Kim, H., McDonald, M. D., & Mendes, S. M. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199244003.001.0001 · Cited by 1,276
Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies
Huber, J. D., & Inglehart, R. (1995) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068895001001004 · Cited by 1,161
A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. L. (1985) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111172 · Cited by 1,005
Laver, M., & Hunt, W. B. (1992) · Cited by 943
Left–Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments
Castles, F. G., & Mair, P. (1984) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1984.tb00080.x · Cited by 914
Ideology, Strategy and Party Change
(1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558771 · Cited by 904
Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference
King, G. (1989) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 710
Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies
Wallerstein, M. (1999) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991830 · Cited by 691
Party Policy and Government Coalitions
Laver, M. J., & Budge, I. (1992) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22368-8 · Cited by 608
Gabel, M. J., & Huber, J. D. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669295 · Cited by 561
Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies
Franzese, R. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810404 · Cited by 479
Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors
Laver, M. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203451656 · Cited by 316
Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries
Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. J. (1998) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414098031003003 · Cited by 312
Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of The Federalist Papers
Mosteller, F. C., & Wallace, D. K. (2012) · Cited by 299
Unifying Political Methodology
King, G. (1998) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.23784 · Cited by 278
A Spatial Bargaining Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems
Baron, D. P. (1991) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962882 · Cited by 267
Church, K., & Gale, W. A. (1995) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324900000139 · Cited by 215
Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies
Strøm, K. W. (1984) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414084017002004 · Cited by 214
On the Naive Bayes Model for Text Categorization.
Eyheramendy, S., Lewis, D. D., & Madigan, D. (2003) · Cited by 167
Bawn, K. (1999) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991832 · Cited by 150
The Analysis of Literary Style--A Review
Holmes, D. I. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981893 · Cited by 138
Minority governments, minimal winning coalitions and surplus majorities in parliamentary systems
Crombez, C. (1996) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00639.x · Cited by 130
The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration
Druckman, J. N., & THIES, M. F. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088432 · Cited by 114
Ideological Diversity and Government Survival in Western European Parliamentary Democracies
WARWICK, P. V. (1992) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414092025003003 · Cited by 111
Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap
Lewis, J. B., & Poole, K. T. (2004) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mph015 · Cited by 109
A Robust Transformation Procedure for Interpreting Political Text
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpm010 · Cited by 102
Left—Right Positions of Political Parties in Switzerland
Hug, S., & Schulz, T. (2007) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068807075938 · Cited by 101
Quantitative Analysis of Literary Styles
Peng, R. D., & Hengartner, N. (2002) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313002100 · Cited by 94
Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation
Druckman, J. N., Martin, L. W., & THIES, M. F. (2005) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.3162/036298005x201662 · Cited by 84
Do they work? Validating computerised word frequency estimates against policy series
Budge, I., & Pennings, P. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.002 · Cited by 76
Party Positions and Voter Orientations
Klingemann, H. (1998) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198294735.003.0006 · Cited by 69
Institutions and coalition formation: The German election of 2005
Proksch, S., & Slapin, J. B. (2006) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402380600619884 · Cited by 68
Self-citationBenchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings
Benoit, K. R., & Laver, M. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.001 · Cited by 59
Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context
Laver, M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548477.003.0007 · Cited by 53
George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton 2002
Kaiser, A. (2008) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_123 · Cited by 26
Parametric models of linguistic count data
Jansche, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075133 · Cited by 25
Policy change without government change? German gridlock after the 2002 election
König, T., Blume, T., & Luig, B. (2003) · German Politics · doi:10.1080/09644000412331307604 · Cited by 21
Stevenson, P. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299707.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Language and German Disunity: A Sociolinguistic History of East and West Germany, 1945-2000
Lemmons, R., & Stevenson, P. (2004) · German Studies Review · doi:10.2307/4141038 · Cited by 16
Estimating Party Policy Positions with Uncertainty Based on Manifesto Codings
Benoit, K. R., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2007) · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- De Swaan Abram, 1973, Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation
- Klingemann Hans‐Dieter, 1995, Citizens and the State, 183
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mps028 · Cited by 3,297
Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., Shah, A., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Seligman, M. E. P., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791 · Cited by 1,700
quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data
Benoit, K. R., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00774 · Cited by 1,511
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage
Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020950735 · Cited by 715
How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x · Cited by 671
Metadata
- Authors
- Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 705-722
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W1998151601
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 143.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- party positions, policy positions, word frequency, party manifestos, time series estimation, German political parties, party system change, political connotation, left-right positioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
