The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?
Abstract
Political scientists presenting binary dependent variable (BDV) models often hypothesize that variables interact to influence the probability of an event, Pr(Y). The current typical approach to testing such hypotheses is (1) estimate a logit or probit model with a product term, (2) test the hypothesis by determining whether the coefficient for this term is statistically significant, and (3) characterize the nature of any interaction detected by describing how the estimated effect of one variable on Pr(Y) varies with the value of another. This approach makes a statistically significant product term necessary to support the interaction hypothesis. We show that a statistically significant product term is neither necessary nor sufficient for variables to interact meaningfully in influencing Pr(Y). Indeed, even when a logit or probit model contains no product term, the effect of one variable on Pr(Y) may be strongly related to the value of another. We present a strategy for testing for interaction in a BDV model, including guidance on when to include a product term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hargittai, E., & Shaw, A. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.957711 · Cited by 257
Sustained drought, vulnerability and civil conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa
von Uexkull, N. (2014) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.10.003 · Cited by 149
Understanding the Adoption of Voter Identification Laws in the American States
Biggers, D. R., & Hanmer, M. J. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x16687266 · Cited by 100
Exposure to television and individual beliefs: Evidence from a natural experiment
Hennighausen, T. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2015.03.005 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Esarey, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-28
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 248-266
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2027781606
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.