The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Management in Operations: The Selection of Environmental Technologies*
Abstract
Manufacturing firms have given management of the natural environment higher priority as public awareness and scrutiny has increased. To help understand management's role in this process, a basic conceptual model of environmental management within operations is developed. The model proposes that the general orientation of operations managers on environmental issues ranges from proactive to reactive, and this is intrinsically related to the investment pattern in environmental technologies. Results from an empirical validation of this model are presented for a sample of plants from the furniture industry. Three distinct groups were identified based on the linkage between environmental management orientation and investment in environmental technologies. Counter to the prescriptive environmental literature, which recommends that proactive orientation should emphasize pollution prevention (i.e., fundamental product and process changes), proactive managers implemented a balanced portfolio that also included a sizable proportion of pollution control technologies (i.e., traditional end‐of‐pipe controls and remediation). Contextual factors also differentiate among these three groups, thus suggesting options for senior management to assist plant managers to become more proactive and to improve environmental performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,277
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,120
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Osmond, M. W., & Dillman, D. A. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577403 · Cited by 5,023
A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.
RUSSO, M. V., & FOUTS, P. A. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257052 · Cited by 4,805
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
A dynamic model of process and product innovation
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7 · Cited by 3,509
Ullmann, A. A. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258135 · Cited by 2,645
Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs
Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00842.x · Cited by 1,773
Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)91637-7 · Cited by 1,751
Cited by
Yang, M. G. (., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.017 · Cited by 961
Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001 · Cited by 956
A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity
González‐Benito, J., & González‐Benito, Ó. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.450 · Cited by 850
An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management
Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A., & Geng, Y. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.042 · Cited by 788
Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis
González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.002 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 601-631
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2109902541
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Management in Operations: The Selection of Environmental Technologies*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00900.x
- The paper
- Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). Environmental Management in Operations: The Selection of Environmental Technologies*. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00900.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.