The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities
Abstract
Sharing knowledge and information is an important factor in the discourses on electronic government, national security, and human capital management in public administration. This article analyzes the impact of organizational context and IT on employees’ perceptions of knowledge‐sharing capabilities in five public sector and five private sector organizations in South Korea. Social networks, centralization, performance‐based reward systems, employee usage of IT applications, and user‐friendly IT systems were found to significantly affect employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities in the organizations studied. For public sector employees, social networks, performance‐based reward systems, and employee usage of IT applications are all positively associated with high levels of employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities. Lessons and implications for knowledge‐sharing capabilities and management leadership in the public sector are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework
Ipe, M. (2003) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484303257985 · Cited by 1,608
Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter
Andrews, K. M., & Delahaye, B. L. (2000) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00204 · Cited by 501
Cited by
Eldor, L. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mux028 · Cited by 159
Reychav, I., & Te’eni, D. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.009 · Cited by 37
The influence of independent contractors on organizational effectiveness: A review
Flinchbaugh, C., Zare, M., Chadwick, C., Li, P., & Essman, S. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.002 · Cited by 34
Azeem, M., Aziz, S., Shahid, J., Hayat, A., Ahmed, M., & Khan, M. I. (2022) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-09-2020-0083 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S., & Lee, H.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 370-385
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2109900361
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 48.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
- The paper
- Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
