Cited by 214Disaster Management and ResiliencePublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Learning from the Katrina crisis: A global and international perspective with implications for future crisis management

Farazmand, Ali·2007·Public Administration Review

Abstract

The study of crisis and emergency management—or mismanagement—during Hurricane Katrina will continue to proliferate in the near future. This article presents a global and international perspective on Katrina as a case of “grand failure” in crisis and emergency management, with lessons and implications for future crisis management. Benefiting from empirical data collected from international interviews, the essay presents a theoretical analysis of emergency governance and crisis management, discusses a detailed global perspective on Katrina crisis management as “management and leadership crisis,” offers a number of key lessons learned from Katrina, and draws policy and administrative recommendations for future crisis and emergency management through a theory of “surprise management” that is adaptive, collaborative, and citizen engaging and draws on chaos and complexity theories to cope with hyper‐uncertainties and unknowns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00824.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farazmand, A.
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
67
Issue
s1
Pages
149-159
ISSN
  • 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6210
OpenAlex
W2023501570
Cited by
214
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
Hurricane Katrina, crisis management, emergency management, emergency governance, lessons learned, chaos theory, complexity theory, citizen participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review