The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance
Abstract
E‐governance comprises the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to support public services, government administration, democratic processes, and relationships among citizens, civil society, the private sector, and the state. Developed over more than two decades of technology innovation and policy response, the evolution of e‐governance is examined in terms of five interrelated objectives: a policy framework, enhanced public services, high‐quality and cost‐effective government operations, citizen engagement in democratic processes, and administrative and institutional reform. This summary assessment of e‐governance in U.S. states and local governments shows that the greatest investment and progress have been made in enhanced public services and improved government operations. Policy development has moved forward on several fronts, but new policy issues continually add to an increasingly complex set of concerns. The least progress appears to have occurred in enhancing democracy and exploring the implications of e‐governance for administrative and institutional reform. ICT‐enabled governance will continue to evolve for the foreseeable future providing a dynamic environment for ongoing learning and action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector
Weiss, J. A., Osborne, D., Gaebler, T., & Review, N. P. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258896 · Cited by 4,540
Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector
Kelnert, T. M. M., & Silva, C. D. C. (1993) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-75901993000600010 · Cited by 3,317
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1 · Cited by 2,645
Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4209 · Cited by 1,303
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative
Ho, A. T. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00197 · Cited by 1,171
Grosz, M. (2010) · Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004163300.i-1081.558 · Cited by 868
Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare?
Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x · Cited by 645
Analysis of an electronic voting system
Kohno, T., Stubblefield, A., Rubin, A. D., & Wallach, D. S. (2004) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/secpri.2004.1301313 · Cited by 539
From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less
Gore, A. (1993) · Cited by 472
Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks
Dawes, S. S. (1996) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199622)15:3<377::aid-pam3>3.0.co;2-f · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Cited by
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies
Meijer, A. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001 · Cited by 365
Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future
Dawes, S. S. (2009) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003 · Cited by 262
Self-citationTassabehji, R., Hackney, R., & Popovič, A. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.003 · Cited by 103
Cultivating trustworthy artificial intelligence in digital government
Harrison, T. M., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320980122 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawes, S. S.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-21
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- s1
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2162776220
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 87.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x
- The paper
- Dawes, S. S. (2008). The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.