Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes?
Abstract
While various descriptive and prescriptive citizen participation models suggest ways to improve citizen participation, none has been subjected to large‐scale empirical tests. This article develops and tests an organizational theory model that explores the conditions under which citizen involvement as a general strategy can improve administrative decision making. The new model focuses on organizational variables that are more directly subject to managerial influence, such as political support, leadership, red tape, and hierarchical authority, as well as variables related to participant competence and representativeness. Hypotheses are tested with data collected from a national survey of local government managers. The results suggest that public management matters for citizen participation. The conclusion calls for integrating quantitative designs with normative and qualitative citizen participation research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Political buy-in is necessary for an effective participatory budgeting program.
“Research suggests that political buy-in is necessary for an effective PB program (Ebdon and Franklin 2006;Yang and Pandey 2011).”
From Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Yang and Pandey 2011
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064 · see citing works
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761 · Cited by 2,182 · see citing works
Lupia, A. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944882 · Cited by 1,850 · see citing works
The question of participation: Toward Authentic public participation in public administration
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. (1998) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/977561 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis
Taylor, C. R., Afshan, S., & Lawrence, K. L. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.13055 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Kaifeng
- Pandey, Sanjay K.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 880-892
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2111430401
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 39.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- citizen participation, administrative decisions, organizational theory, political support, leadership, red tape, hierarchical authority, representativeness, local government managers, public sector management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review