The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases the Latency of the Thalamocortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential
Abstract
The Neurocybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) is a pacemaker-like device that has been designed to provide chronic intermittent vagus nerve stimulation. It is currently under study for the treatment of refractory partial onset epilepsy, and preliminary studies have indicated that partial onset seizures are improved by this therapy. The mechanisms by which it exerts its antiepileptic effect are not well understood. Although there are extensive pathways to the forebrain from the nuclei of the vagus nerve, the evidence that the NCP alters neural transmission outside the vagal system is limited. We prospectively examined somatosensory and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in three patients receiving NCP implantation to determine if changes in these studies occur as a result of chronic vagus nerve stimulation. The results demonstrate a significant prolongation of the cervicomedullary to thalamocortical potential (N13-N20) interval on somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) studies following activation of the device. No other significant changes were seen on SSEP or BAEP in the NCP implanted patients or normal controls. The findings suggest that chronic vagus nerve stimulation does alter neuronal networks outside of the brain stem vagus system, and may potentially provide a means to clinically monitor and titrate this therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of Vagal Stimulation on Experimentally Induced Seizures in Rats
Woodbury, D. M., & Woodbury, J. W. (1990) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05852.x · Cited by 369
Cited by
Evidence for a viscerotopic sensory representation in the cortex and thalamus in the rat
Cechetto, D. F., & Saper, C. B. (1987) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902620104 · Cited by 703
Bonaz, B., Sinniger, V., & Pellissier, S. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271539 · Cited by 561
Browning, K. N., & Travagli, R. A. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130055 · Cited by 541
Dong, H., Petrovich, G. D., Watts, A. G., & Swanson, L. W. (2001) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.1079 · Cited by 521
Efferent projections of the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in the rat
Moga, M. M., Weis, R. P., & Moore, R. Y. (1995) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903590204 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- NARITOKU, D. K., MORALES, A., PENCEK, T. L., & WINKLER, D.
- Venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1572-1578
- ISSN
- 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8159
- OpenAlex
- W1981217636
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases the Latency of the Thalamocortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02935.x
- The paper
- NARITOKU, D. K., MORALES, A., PENCEK, T. L., & WINKLER, D. (1992). Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases the Latency of the Thalamocortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02935.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.