Cited by 21Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Efficacy and safety of ibutilide for the conversion of monomorphic atrial tachycardia

EIDHER, ULRIKE, FREIHOFF, FRITZ, KALTENBRUNNER, WILHELM, STEINBACH, KONRAD·2006·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ibutilide is a class III antiarrhythmic drug, frequently used for conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. We studied the efficacy of ibutilide for acute conversion of monomorphic atrial tachycardia (monoAT) in a prospective, open label study in the intensive care unit of a cardiological clinic. METHODS: We examined 49 episodes of monoAT in 38 patients (19 men/19 women). Thirty-three patients (87%) suffered from structural heart disease. Twenty-three episodes occurred while on antiarrhythmic therapy with class I or III drugs. Patients with prolonged QT interval (except for patients with pretreatment with class III drugs), hypokalemia, left ventricular failure, and recent myocardial infarction were excluded. All patients received one or two doses of 1 mg ibutilide fumarate under continuous rhythm monitoring. RESULTS: Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 19 episodes (38.8%), in 6 episodes (12.2%) after the first dose. Conversion rate was significantly higher in patients with a short history of symptoms (66.6% vs 28.6%; P < 0.05), of documented arrhythmia (0.13 (0/5.7) vs 2.6 (0.38/23.5) months, median (interquartile range); P < 0.03), higher atrial rate (272 +/- 49 vs 207 +/- 36 beats/min (means +/- SD); P < 0.004), or without preexisting antiarrhythmic therapy (53.8% vs 21.7%; P < 0.02). No differences in conversion rates were found regarding gender, age, body mass index, left ventricular function, left atrial diameter, or underlying disease. In three episodes torsade de pointes occurred after ibutilide (6.1%), requiring defibrillation in two cases (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Ibutilide can be used for conversion of monoAT with a similar efficacy as for atrial fibrillation, but with a considerably lower efficacy compared to typical atrial flutter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00353.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EIDHER, U., FREIHOFF, F., KALTENBRUNNER, W., & STEINBACH, K.
Affiliations
Wilhelminen Hospital (AT)
Corresponding author
EIDHER, ULRIKE
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
358-362
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2041209919
Cited by
21
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
ibutilide, conversion to sinus rhythm, class III antiarrhythmic agents, torsades de pointes, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, structural heart disease, antiarrhythmic therapy, atrial rate
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sulfonamides, Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review