Cited by 73Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsSex and Gender in Healthcare

Gender differences in patients referred for atrial fibrillation management to a tertiary center

ROTEN, LAURENT, RIMOLDI, STEFANO F., SCHWICK, NICOLA, SAKATA, TAKAO, HEIMGARTNER, CHRIS, FUHRER, JUERG, DELACRÉTAZ, ETIENNE, TANNER, HILDEGARD·2009·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is less frequently performed in women than in men. Although the prevalence of AF is slightly higher in men, this does not fully account for the lower number of AF ablations performed in women. This study sought to examine the effect of gender on referral for AF and subsequent AF management. Methods Consecutive patients referred to our tertiary arrhythmia outpatient clinic for AF management were retrospectively analyzed. Results Of 264 patients referred, only 27% were women. Women were older than men (63 +/- 9 vs 58 +/- 11 years, P = 0.002), more often had paroxysmal AF (78% vs 63% in men, P = 0.022), and women more frequently complained about palpitations (71% vs 49%, P = 0.002). In addition, they had more often experienced amiodarone side effects than men (56% vs 36%, P = 0.046). In this referred population, there was no difference in the proportion of women and men undergoing AF ablation immediately following the initial evaluation (21% vs 25%, P = ns), at any time during the follow-up (38% vs 44%, P = ns), and there was no difference in the proportion of patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation in both sexes (6% of women vs 3% of men, P = ns). Conclusions There is an important difference in the proportion of men and women referred for management of AF in a specialized outpatient arrhythmia clinic, with women being referred three times less often than men. However, there is no gender-related difference in the subsequent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02335.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROTEN, L., RIMOLDI, S. F., SCHWICK, N., SAKATA, T., HEIMGARTNER, C., FUHRER, J., DELACRÉTAZ, E., & TANNER, H.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
ROTEN, LAURENT
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-14
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
622-626
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2069428700
Cited by
73
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, gender differences, sex disparities in care, referral rates, catheter ablation, atrioventricular node ablation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, palpitations
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Industry, Male, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Switzerland, Incidence, Catheter Ablation, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review