Cited by 1,939Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study

Heeringa, Jan, van der Kuip, Deirdre A.M., Hofman, Albert, Kors, Jan A., van Herpen, Gerard, Stricker, Bruno H.Ch., Stijnen, Theo, Lip, Gregory Y.H. +1 more·2006·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a large European population-based study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study is part of the Rotterdam study, a population-based prospective cohort study among subjects aged 55 years and above. The prevalence at baseline was assessed in 6808 participants. Incidence of AF was investigated during a mean follow-up period of 6.9 years in 6432 persons. We identified 376 prevalent and 437 incident cases. Overall prevalence was 5.5%, rising from 0.7% in the age group 55-59 years to 17.8% in those aged 85 years and above. The overall incidence rate was 9.9/1000 person-years. The incidence rate in the age group 55-59 years was 1.1/1000 person-years, rose to 20.7/1000 person-years in the age group 80-84 years and stabilized in those aged 85 years and above. Prevalence and incidence were higher in men than in women. The lifetime risk to develop AF at the age of 55 years was 23.8% in men and 22.2% in women. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study in a European population, the prevalence and incidence of AF increased with age and were higher in men than in women. The high lifetime risk to develop AF was similar to North American epidemiological data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heeringa, J., van der Kuip, D. A. M., Hofman, A., Kors, J. A., van Herpen, G., Stricker, B. H. C., Stijnen, T., Lip, G. Y. H., & Witteman, J. C. M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Heeringa, Jan
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2006-03-09
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
949-953
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2148056560
Cited by
1,939
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 112 · 2015: 153 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 113
FWCI
31.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Digest of the World Core Medical Journals(Cardiology)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk, age differences, sex differences, older adults, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review