Cited by 113Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Pharmacologic rate versus rhythm-control strategies in atrial fibrillation: an updated comprehensive review and meta-analysis

CHATTERJEE, SAURAV, SARDAR, PARTHA, LICHSTEIN, EDGAR, MUKHERJEE, DEBABRATA, AIKAT, SHAMIK·2013·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular rate control with medications has been found to be noninferior in preventing clinical events, compared to a strategy converting patients to sinus rhythm and maintaining it with medications. Guidelines have accepted rate control as an acceptable therapeutic option. Most of the prior studies excluded patients without significant left ventricular dysfunction, or permanent AF. METHODS: The authors searched the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1966 to 2011. Trials included were direct head-to-head comparisons of rate- and rhythm-control strategy using pharmacological means. The primary outcome assessed was risk of all-cause mortality. We also assessed other pooled clinical endpoints using a random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel) between rate and rhythm-control strategies. RESULTS: Ten studies (total N = 7,867) met inclusion/exclusion criteria. In-hospital mortality was not different between groups (P = 0.31). The rates of stroke, systemic embolism, worsening heart failure, myocardial infarction, and bleeding were also similar. However, rates of rehospitalization were much lower with a rate-control strategy (P = 0.007). An exploratory analysis in patients younger than 65 years revealed a rhythm-control strategy was superior to rate control in the prevention of all-cause mortality (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests no difference in clinical outcomes with a rate or rhythm-control strategy with AF. However, rehospitalization rates appear to be lower with pharmacological rate control for all ages, while finding support for rhythm control in younger patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03513.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All trials that have compared rhythm control to rate control (with appropriate anticoagulation) therapy have resulted in neutral outcomes.

    “Although many clinicians believe that maintaining sinus rhythm can improve outcomes in AF patients, 588 all trials that have compared rhythm control to rate control (with appropriate anticoagulation) therapy have resulted in neutral outcomes.41,578,579,582,[589][590][591][592][593]”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHATTERJEE, S., SARDAR, P., LICHSTEIN, E., MUKHERJEE, D., & AIKAT, S.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Metropolitan Hospital Center (US)
  • Maimonides Medical Center (US)
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
CHATTERJEE, SAURAV
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-14
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
122-133
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W1717660429
Cited by
113
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, rate control, rhythm control, sinus rhythm maintenance, all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, stroke and systemic embolism, heart failure, hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, age differences in treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Prevalence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Defibrillators, Implantable, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review