Cited by 239Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Rate vs Rhythm Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis

de Denus, Simon·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2 fundamental approaches to the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) are reestablishing and maintaining sinus rhythm (rhythm control) and controlling ventricular rate with atrioventricular node blocking agents (rate control). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing these strategies in patients with AF to add precision to the relative merits of both strategies on the risk of all-cause mortality and to evaluate the consistency of the results between trials. METHODS: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE (1966 to May 2003), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry (first quarter of 2003), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to May 2003). Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacologic rhythm and rate control strategies as first-line therapy in patients with AF. RESULTS: Five trials were identified that included a total of 5,239 patients with persistent AF or AF that was considered likely to be recurrent. No significant difference was observed between the rate and the rhythm control groups regarding all-cause mortality, although a strong trend in favor of a rate control approach was observed (13.0% vs 14.6%; odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.02; P=.09). No heterogeneity was apparent between the trials (Q value=2.97; P=.56). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF or with AF that is likely to be recurrent, a strategy of ventricular rate control, in combination with anticoagulation in appropriate patients, appears to be at least equivalent to a strategy of maintaining sinus rhythm by using currently available antiarrhythmic drugs in preventing clinical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.3.258

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All trials that have compared rhythm control to rate control (with appropriate anticoagulation) therapy have resulted in neutral outcomes.

    “Although many clinicians believe that maintaining sinus rhythm can improve outcomes in AF patients, 588 all trials that have compared rhythm control to rate control (with appropriate anticoagulation) therapy have resulted in neutral outcomes.41,578,579,582,[589][590][591][592][593]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Denus, S.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-02-14
Volume
165
Issue
3
Pages
258
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989801282
Cited by
239
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, rate control, rhythm control, antiarrhythmic drugs, all-cause mortality, persistent atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, first-line therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Drug Therapy, Combination, Electric Countershock, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Recurrence, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review