Cited by 42Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia After Radiofrequency Ablation of Para‐Hisian Accessory Pathways

PAPPONE, CARLO, STABILE, GIUSEPPE, ORETO, GIUSEPPE, DE SIMONE, ANTONIO, RILLO, MARIANO, MAZZONE, PATRIZIO, CAPPATO, RICCARDO, CHIERCHIA, SERGIO·1997·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Introduction Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) has been observed following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the AV nodal fast pathway. This study was aimed to prospectively analyze the incidence and clinical significance of IST following RFA of para-Hisian accessory pathways (APs). Methods and results Twenty-eight patients (pts) with para-Hisian APs underwent RFA. An AP was defined as para-Hisian whenever its atrial and ventricular insertions were associated with a His-bundle potential > or = 0.1 mV. RF current was always delivered at the atrial aspect of the tricuspid annulus, to a site where the His-bundle potential was Conclusion IST is a relatively frequent complication after RFA of para-Hisian APs: it is generally short-lasting and usually does not require any treatment. IST after catheter ablation is likely to depend upon transient parasympathetic denervation of the sinus node.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb01032.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiofrequency catheter ablation to modify the sinus node or eliminate sympathetic inputs, at best, is partially effective.

    “Radiofrequency catheter ablation to modify the sinus node or eliminate sympathetic inputs, at best, is partially effective. 10,30,60,61,76-88”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAPPONE, C., STABILE, G., ORETO, G., DE SIMONE, A., RILLO, M., MAZZONE, P., CAPPATO, R., & CHIERCHIA, S.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Casa di Cura San Michele (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (DE)
Corresponding author
PAPPONE, CARLO
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-12
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
1357-1365
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2063683371
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, radiofrequency ablation complications, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, His bundle potential, heart rate variability, parasympathetic denervation, sinoatrial node
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Atrioventricular Node, Female, Humans, Male, Tachycardia, Sinus, Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review