Cited by 14Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Noncontact electroanatomic mapping to characterize typical atrial flutter: participation of right atrial posterior wall in the reentrant circuit

DIXIT, SANJAY, LAVI, NIMROD, ROBINSON, MELISSA, RILEY, MICHAEL P., CALLANS, DAVID J., MARCHLINSKI, FRANCIS E., LIN, DAVID·2011·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reentry utilizing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is accepted as the mechanism underlying typical atrial flutter (AFLT). However, it is unclear how the right atrial (RA) posterior wall (PW) participates in AFLT circuit. We sought to investigate this by using noncontact electroanatomic mapping. METHODS: Fifteen patients (pts) undergoing ablation for typical AFLT participated. Multipolar catheters were deployed in RA and coronary sinus. RA shell was created during AFLT. Entrainment was performed to confirm CTI dependence and assess participation of various RA regions (septum-Sep, PW, lateral wall-LW). Data were analyzed for (1) RA activation patterns and (2) conduction time (CT) through various RA regions. RESULTS: Mean pt age was 70 ± 13 years (all males; CCW = 10; CW = 5). Mean AFLT cycle length was 255 ± 15 ms. Single activation wave front traversing sequentially CTI, Sep, and LW was seen in all pts and in 12 (80%; 9 CCW, 3 CW) this also traversed PW. Entrainment confirmed PW participation in 7 of these. Mean CT (in ms) through various RA regions was as follows: CTI = 69 ± 27, Sep = 50 ± 39, PW = 65 ± 35, and LW = 76 ± 35; P = NS. CONCLUSION: These observations offer new insights regarding the participation of PW in the reentrant circuit of typical AFLT in some patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01917.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
DIXIT, S., LAVI, N., ROBINSON, M., RILEY, M. P., CALLANS, D. J., MARCHLINSKI, F. E., & LIN, D.
Affiliations
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
DIXIT, SANJAY
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-11
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
422-430
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1990875509
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
typical atrial flutter, reentrant circuit, cavotricuspid isthmus, atrial activation patterns, conduction time, entrainment, atrial flutter ablation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Flutter, Electrocardiography, Heart Atria, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Body Surface Potential Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review