The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue
Abstract
About two decades ago, Paul Sabatier (1991) urged scholars to develop better theories and empirics for understanding policy processes. Sabatier’s proposition, in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831739 · Cited by 5,140
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm · Cited by 4,229
Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach
Roberts, A., Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1994) · Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques · doi:10.2307/3551961 · Cited by 3,628
Self-citation(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-6243 · Cited by 3,579
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Sabatier, P. A. (1988) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00136406 · Cited by 3,570
Self-citationTheories of the Policy Process
Sabatier, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367274689 · Cited by 3,490
Self-citationBackground on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Ostrom, E. (2011) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x · Cited by 1,719
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Self-citationThe advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe
Sabatier, P. A. (1998) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501768880000051 · Cited by 1,462
Self-citation
Cited by
An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12025 · Cited by 324
Lammers, I., & Heldeweg, M. A. (2016) · Energy, Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-016-0102-z · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins‐Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & deLeon, P.
- Venue
- Policy Studies Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-27
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-360
- ISSN
- 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0072
- OpenAlex
- W2171134913
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
- The paper
- Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins‐Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & deLeon, P. (2011). A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
