The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada
Abstract
Policy makers who embrace market‐based approaches to environmental regulation, typically eschew carbon taxes in favor of the political advantages of cap and trade, which offers lower visibility of costs to consumers and the opportunity to allocate valuable permits freely to industry. Against this backdrop, the article examines two surprising proposals for carbon taxes, by the government of British Columbia (BC) and by the federal Liberal Party of Canada. Both reflected a triumph of party leaders' normative “good policy” motives over “good politics.” The BC tax alone succeeded first because it was adopted by a party already in government. Second, the onset of a recession before the next elections shifted voters' attention to the economy, which advantaged the BC Liberals but disadvantaged their federal counterparts. However, proposals for carbon taxes were unpopular in both jurisdictions, offering a cautionary tale concerning the fate of politicians' normative commitments absent electoral backing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Cited by
Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages
Lockwood, M. (2018) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411 · Cited by 666
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
Green, J. F. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9 · Cited by 530
Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change
Althor, G., Watson, J. E. M., & Fuller, R. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20281 · Cited by 353
Jobs and climate policy: Evidence from British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax
Yamazaki, A. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.003 · Cited by 295
Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world
Carl, J., & Fedor, D. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.023 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, K.
- Venue
- Review of Policy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-407
- ISSN
- 1541-132X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1338
- OpenAlex
- W1897310778
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00565.x
- The paper
- Harrison, K. (2012). A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00565.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.