Cited by 51Cultural Competency in Health CareMigration, Health and TraumaInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

Lost in Translation: Reproductive Health Care Experiences of Somali Bantu Women in Hartford, Connecticut

Open access
Gurnah, Khadija, Khoshnood, Kaveh, Bradley, Elizabeth, Yuan, Christina·2011·Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

Abstract

Introduction: Reproductive health problems are the leading cause of women's morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, officially sponsored refugee women continue to face challenges in accessing reproductive health programs despite having access to health insurance. Methods: The objective of this study was to explore the reproductive health experiences of 1 such population—Somali Bantu women in Connecticut—to identify potential barriers to care experienced by marginalized populations. The study was qualitative, consisting of key informant interviews, a focus group session, and a semistructured survey. Results: Although all the women in the study reported having access to reproductive health care services, they also reported having unmet health needs resulting from barriers to care that included ethnic distinction/language barriers, passive acceptance of incorrect care, cultural discordance in family planning services, patient‐provider sex discordance, and desire but limited scope for ownership in health care outcomes. The root cause of the various types of patient‐provider discordance was the lack of recognition that the Somali Bantu are distinct in culture, language, and solidarity from ethnic Somalis, resulting in Language Line translation services being conducted in a Somali language that the Somali Bantu women did not understand. Discussion: The results of the study primarily highlight the larger issue of information asymmetry within the health care system that, if left unaddressed, will persist as new vulnerable populations of refugees arrive in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00028.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language barriers have been shown to cause delays in other contexts.

    “The extent to which language barriers lead to delays both inside and outside of the camps has not been studied, however language barriers have been shown to cause delays in other contexts.64–66”

    From Mortality in Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh: historical, social, and political context (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results section identifies language barriers as the most commonly reported problem in accessing care, and the Discussion links limited language skills to unmet needs. Neither section reports that language barriers caused delays, so the specific outcome attributed to this source is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carroll J, Epstein R, Fiscella K, Gipson T, Volpe E, Jean-Pierre P. Car- ing for Somali women: implications for clinician-patient communica- tion. Patient Edu Counsel. 2007;66:337-345.
  2. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Early steps in analysis. In Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:50-89.
  3. Shmanske S. Information asymmetries in health services: the market can cope. Independ Rev. 1996;1:191-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurnah, K., Khoshnood, K., Bradley, E., & Yuan, C.
Affiliations
  • Community Health Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gurnah, Khadija
Venue
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
340-346
ISSN
  • 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2011
OpenAlex
W2050946088
Cited by
51
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Yale School of Public Health, Yale University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
refugee women, reproductive health care, barriers to care, language barriers, family planning, patient-provider communication, information asymmetry, health care access, Hartford, Connecticut
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Communication Barriers, Connecticut, Cultural Characteristics, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Status, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Somalia, Nursing Methodology Research, Women's Health, Focus Groups, Vulnerable Populations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review