Cited by 49Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisECG Monitoring and Analysis

Comparison of Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima and Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of Heart Rate in Patients with Systolic Dysfunction of Left Ventricle

Open access
Galaska, Rafal, Makowiec, Danuta, Dudkowska, Aleksandra, Koprowski, Andrzej, Chlebus, Krzysztof, Wdowczyk‐Szulc, Joanna, Rynkiewicz, Andrzej·2008·Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

Abstract

Background: In recent years the WTMM (wavelet transform modulus maxima) and MDFA (multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis) methods have become widely used techniques for the determination of nonlinear, multifractal heart rate (HR) dynamics. The purpose of our study was to compare multifractal parameters of heart rate calculated using both methods in a group of 90 patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function (rlvs group) and in a group of 39 healthy persons (nsr group). Methods: For each subject from the rlvs group (LVEF ≤40%) and the nsr group, a 24‐hour ECG Holter monitoring was performed. The width of the multifractal spectrum and global Hurst exponent were calculated by means of WTMM and MDFA methods for 5‐hour daytime and nighttime subsets. Results: The width of the multifractal spectrum was significantly lower and the Hurst exponent was significantly higher in rlvs group in comparison to nsr group both during diurnal activity and nocturnal rest according to MDFA and only during diurnal activity according to WTMM method. In both groups we observed significant differences of the multifractal spectrum width and the global Hurst exponent between the nighttime and daytime recordings. Conclusions: MDFA seems to be more sensitive as compared with WTMM method in differentiation between multifractal properties of the heart rate in healthy subjects and patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2008.00215.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The multifractal fluctuation analysis method is superior to the wavelet transform modulus maxima method for studying multifractal properties of the heart rate in healthy subjects and patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

    “the authors found that the multifractal fluctuation analysis method is superior to the wavelet transform modulus maxima method for studying multifractal properties of the heart rate both in healthy subjects and patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]13. Amaral LAN, Ivanov PCH, Aoyagi N, et al. Behavioralindependent features of complex heartbeat dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 2001;86:6026-6029.
  2. [17]17. Binney JJ, Dowrick NJ, Fisher AJ, et al. The Theory of Critical Phenomena. An Introduction to theRenormalization Group. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galaska, R., Makowiec, D., Dudkowska, A., Koprowski, A., Chlebus, K., Wdowczyk‐Szulc, J., & Rynkiewicz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
  • Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Venue
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
155-164
ISSN
  • 1082-720X (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-474X
OpenAlex
W1965238956
Cited by
49
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
wavelet transform modulus maxima, multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis, heart rate variability, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, multifractal spectrum width, diurnal variation, Holter monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Risk Assessment, Heart Failure, Systolic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review